The serpent shall be crushed under her feet. To her the victory of Christ.
Posted on 05/17/2008 4:15:27 PM PDT by NYer
ST. LOUIS — When Anglicans and Catholics agreed in May 2005 that Marian dogmas were consonant with Scripture, few guessed the accord would signal a veritable Marian regeneration.
Yet, in the nearly three years that have followed, the increasing acceptance of Mary among Christians has been witnessed in everything from theology to pop culture.
The 2006 sleeper hit The Nativity Story, for instance — widely acclaimed by Catholics and Protestants alike — was written by Mike Rich, a nondenominational Christian.
“From the standpoint of ecumenism, the subject of Mary is one we can speak about with a number of groups we’re in dialogue with,” said Lawrence Welch, associate professor of systematic theology at Kenrick-Glennon seminary in St. Louis. He has served on Vatican committees on ecumenism.
“It’s cautious, and among some it’s still taboo,” Welch added, “but there is openness to speak about Mary’s role in salvation history and in the life of Jesus.”
Mary’s inspiration has been most spectacular, however, in the process of conversion.
>In a move that amazed evangelical Protestants and Catholics alike, and continues to rock Christian blogs, Francis Beckwith resigned his high-profile post as president of the Evangelical Theological Society, revealing that he was returning to full communion with the Catholic Church.
That was in May 2007. Providentially, May has long been held in the Church as a particular month of devotion to the Blessed Mother.
Now associate professor of philosophy and Church studies at Baylor University, Beckwith cited an easing of reactionary tendencies among Christians as a chief pathway to reconciliation.
“Many Protestants are asking: Can we honor Mary in a way that’s not so adoring as Catholics but acknowledges that she was the greatest Christian?” he said. “I would speculate that this movement is responding to the accusations against Christ’s divinity by liberal scholars.”
That quest for the “historical Jesus,” which is associated recently with researchers like dissidents John Dominic Crossan and Marcus Borg of the Jesus Seminar, does not accept the dogma of Christ’s two natures in one person, which was defined at the council of Chalcedon in 451.
“Interestingly, a huge increase of Marian devotion occurs right after Chalcedon,” Beckwith noted. “Cardinal Newman was right: The necessity of the Immaculate Conception protects the Church from second-guessing Christ’s divinity and humanity; it protects us against Docetism and Arianism. Evangelicals are realizing this and asking: Do we want to pass this uncertainty to the next generation?”
Church Fathers
Clear about the Mariology he wishes to pass to his students, Daniel Akin, president of the Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, preached at Christmastime on the Magnificat, Mary’s hymn of adoration found in the first chapter of Luke.
“Mary is a great lady, a wonderful wife and mother, and a hero in the faith,” he said. “We as Christians should be grateful and rejoice in her life.”
Akin was wary, though, of what he perceives as excessive devotion to Mary.
“If she were with us today, she’d be scandalized by the way some have elevated her,” he said. “There is no indication in Scripture that she was sinless. She was a sinner, like the rest of us, who needed to be saved by her son.”
That same debate raged back in the fifth century, when St. Leo the Great wrote hundreds of sermons and letters defending Mary Immaculate. In particular, letter No. 28, popularly known as The Tome, led inexorably to that famous declaration at Chalcedon, which included a definition of Mary’s undefiled virginity.
“I’m familiar with Leo’s Tome,” commented Akin. “I think the language there and what the council used is confusing, and I do not agree with Leo’s interpretations.”
Until recently, an open discussion of St. Leo’s work would be a rarity at best. But Kenrick-Glennon’s Welch pointed out that the resurgence of interest in patristics — the theology of the Church Fathers, who wrote in the first six centuries of the Church — has led to greater dialogue among Christians on a range of topics.
“I’ve seen great interest in my book on St. Cyril of Alexandria from evangelicals,” he noted, “maybe even more activity recently than from Catholics.”
And as they turn to the Church Fathers, more Protestants are beginning to work out Marian theology in dialogue with Catholics.
“I recently had a public dialogue with Timothy George, founding dean of Beeson Divinity School, which is Baptist,” Beckwith reported. “We’re both familiar with Scot McKnight’s book (The Real Mary: Why Evangelical Christians Can Embrace the Mother of Jesus), and George is at work on his own book on Mary.”
Naturally, then, Protestants have returned to the Church Fathers with renewed vigor to understand the devotion proper to Mary.
Jim Anderson, assistant director of the Coming Home Network International, encountered in his studies a class dedicated to the subject team-taught by a Presbyterian and an Eastern Orthodox. “I was Methodist, and then a Lutheran, but that course on the early Church removed a lot of hurdles for me.”
Now a Catholic working with Marcus Grodi, the former Presbyterian pastor who hosts EWTN’s “The Journey Home,” Anderson points to Mary as pivotal in the conversions he witnesses.
“To understand Christology you have to understand Mary,” he said. “Faith brought understanding for me, just as it has for a lot of our [formerly Protestant] clergy. True, the Holy Spirit works differently in different people’s hearts. But the numbers of people wanting to know more about the early Church and Mary is like a drumbeat that keeps getting louder and louder.”
“Hail Mary full of grace, the Lord is with thee!”
“Hail Mary full of grace, the Lord is with thee!”
If I were a Catholic, I think I would pray for intercession from one of the lesser known Popes. Mary seems like she would have a plateful with a hundred million Catholics wanting intercession from her.
It would be nice to know what agreement from 2005 the author is talking about.
Danny Akin’s comment does not seem to line up as agreement to the RCC “devotion” to Mary. Unless Akin has become senile, he is still a firm, Biblical Christian who would not embrace extra-Biblical doctrines such as 98% of what passes for “devotion to Mary”. His comments about Mary are on target.
INTREP
I do believe that one of the signs the Christians are coming back together again, even if slowly is a new found respect for Mary. Also what helped was besides the Nativity movie, the Passion of the Christ movie sparked new interest. It shows Mary in a brand new light. This is by the power of the Holy Spirit.
Mary was not a pope. If you were a Catholic, you would pray the rosary where Jesus is the center of the prayer.
The circle of people who agree with that statement seems to be shrinking, praise God.
Never said she was.
If you were a Catholic, you would pray the rosary where Jesus is the center of the prayer.
Catholics often refer to their asking Mary for intercession as prayer, so I am not sure what you are saying. Are they wrong? If so, there is a lot of confusion in the church.
The serpent shall be crushed under her feet. To her the victory of Christ.
Pope St. Eleutherius pray for us
Sancta Maria, ora pro nobis!
What Mary can’t handle, she can pass on to her boy. He can do it.
Part of me says, “hmmm, that's good.”
Another part of me says, “How embarrassing! They're becoming more Catholic than Catholics: voting pro-life, socially conservative, generous to the poor...and now they pray to the Blessed Virgin?!?!?! Quick! Burn some incense, wrap a Rosary around my rear view mirror, wear a T-Shirt of Pope B16 drinking bear on the front and Pope JP2 with sunglasses on the back, staple a Mass Card to my forehead...I was Catholic FIRST!!!!!”
Thanks for the link. None of the signatories are what I would consider Protestants. Anglicans make up the most non-RC signatories - they are junior league RCs. The World Council of Churches is listed - they are and have been apostate for decades.
The title of this article is most misleading, as there is no evidence presented to support the notion that there’s a revival of Mary devotion amongst Protestants. BTW, there would have had to be an initial Mary devotion to have a revival of the same. Don’t think the Reformers had the same view of Mary as does the RCC. I certainly do not.
With all due respect, Mary is the Jewish mother many of us never had.
;)
Then you don't know much about the teachings and writings of Calvin, Luther and Zwingli, for starters. The diminishing by protestants of the unique role that the Blessed Mother plays in the salvation of mankind is a relatively recent occurrence.
That's Akin's interpretation of Scripture. I'll bet he uses the abridged, edited version too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.