Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Gay Marriage and the LDS (Open Vanity)
17 May 2008 | Gamecock

Posted on 05/17/2008 2:20:50 AM PDT by Gamecock

Thesis: Remember when gay rights movement started? The gays stated their goal was just to be accepted. Since that time "accepted" has morphed into what we saw transpire in the California Supreme Court: full marriage rights to the gays. Very few saw this coming at the beginning of the Gay rights movement. The entire process was akin to putting a frog in a pot of cold water and gradually turning up the heat.

THAT being said, is it outlandish to think that the restorationist LDS sectlets, such as the fLDS, will start bringing cases to court claiming their right to legally marry more than one women at a time? Will the courts in "progressive" states side with these sectlets?

And finally, if the sectlets are upheld, say in the next 30 or so years, (about the time it took gays to get this far) will the larger LDS body all of a sudden proclaim a new revelation that Polygamy is now condoned by God?

FR Mainline Mormons: If the presiding prophet declared polygamy once again approved of by God, what would your reaction be?
-Would you men start cruising polygamy bars/matchmaking sites?
-Women: would you encourage your hubbies to bring home more wives? What would you do if he decided to bring home a covey of wives against your wishes? would you have any recourse or would you just resign yourself to that being the ticket to your eternal reward?

Thanks for taking the time to answer the above questions!


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lds; mormon; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: colorcountry; aMorePerfectUnion; Elsie; Gamecock
Don't forget eHaremny, where you can match with 29 women in a different dimension.

(AMPU and I are working on a Muslim version of eHaremny as well. We've up it from 29 to their Scriptural specifications of 72; plus it's not just any woman...they have to to be virgins. In the interest of the sanctity-of-life, however, I think we'll be excluding applications from martyrs)

21 posted on 05/17/2008 11:59:18 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
I think we'll be excluding applications from martyrs)

ROTFL!

22 posted on 05/17/2008 1:07:36 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Plea to mormon FReepers, "DONT HOSE ME, BRO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson