To: FourtySeven; Dr. Eckleburg; netmilsmom
Why don't you quit castigtegating her for her ignorance of that portion of the Catechism, and respond to some of the explanations offered on this thread for it, like CTrent's post #498, for example.
That's not what they're fussing about. I would accept you as a "neutral" observer if you had noted they both, and the "one line hit and run busybody" have carried the entire thing too far. As it is, you obviously have "chosen sides". Too bad.
970 posted on
05/19/2008 2:52:21 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: OLD REGGIE; netmilsmom; Dr. Eckleburg
That's not what they're fussing about. I would accept you as a "neutral" observer if you had noted they both, and the "one line hit and run busybody" have carried the entire thing too far. As it is, you obviously have "chosen sides". Too bad.I don't know what you mean by this, especially the portion in bold. Please elaborate if you so desire.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson