You didn't do that from post #141-169 however, and that's a point you should consider.
The fact remains the words of the RCC catechism somehow caused netmilsmom to call them a "lie."
With all due respect to netmilsmom, the reason is probably the same reason you call it a "lie" even now: because of her ignorance of that portion of the Catechism, and what it really means.
The difference between her and you though is, I would be willing to wager, is that she no longer believes it's a lie, and probably will educate herself further via the explanation CTrent gave in post #498.
>>because of her ignorance of that portion of the Catechism, and what it really means.<<
Truly, the whole think came down to the footnote numbers. From my Baltimore Catechism as a child to my Daughters’ Faith and Life books, NEVER is there a citation of the CCC given that does not have footnote numbers. It just looked strange.
And while I may not have known it by heart (which I did say that I don’t have a photographic memory and use Google) it was the odd way it looked,
I put the words into Quotes and put that string into Google, the results you see in post 169. No Vatican website came up (because the numbers were missing)
I didn’t need the words to show something amiss. Just the missing footnote numbers. If a FRiend of mine had posted it, I would have done the same search.