To: FourtySeven; netmilsmom
She wasn't saying that the words you posted were NECESSARILY wrong, she was saying that she had never read that in the Catechism beforeLOL. That is not what she wrote in the slightest. We have no idea if Netmilsmom has ever read the catechism. We only have her words declaring the exact wording from the RCC catechism to be a "lie."
By her post, she thought those words came from some anti-catholic website, which they did not. They are the exact words of the RCC catechism.
However, she is right to call those words a "lie" because men to NOT become "gods," as the RCC catechism foolish and blasphemously errs.
902 posted on
05/19/2008 12:08:54 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg; netmilsmom
LOL. That is not what she wrote in the slightest.But that's clearly implied, that is, for anyone who objectively looks at her post #169.
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Are you still getting FR when you click that link?
906 posted on
05/19/2008 12:17:32 PM PDT by
netmilsmom
(I am Ironmom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
To: Dr. Eckleburg
We only have her words declaring the exact wording from the RCC catechism to be a "lie."That is false, as shown over and over.
907 posted on
05/19/2008 12:20:17 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson