My link was to the Vatican.va, directly from the Vatican, as anyone can see from my post. Hit the link, which I kindly furnished, and you will be wisked away to Vaticanland.
The excerpt I posted was VERBATIM from the link, the first time without the footnote numbers for clarity, and the second time with the footnote numbers, for further clarity.
You still have no answer for why you were shocked to read those words straight from the RCC catechism.
Although the fact you were shocked by the words of the catechism, and even doubted that they came from the RCC but instead from some "anti-Catholic website," with or without the footnotes, is a step forward.
God willing, you'll stay on course. The words of #460 of the RCC catechism are indeed shocking for any Bible-believing Christian.
and yes it was astounding to seeI went back to review and it was vatican.va
b'SHEM Yah'shua
the anti-scriptural notions being
taught by the vatican !
>>You still have no answer for why you were shocked to read those words straight from the RCC catechism. <<
1. You are saying I was shocked, I said it was a lie. (no numbers means no Vatican.va, reading minds against forum rules)
>>My link was to the Vatican.va, directly from the Vatican<<
2. Original post was doctored with no link
3. Accused me of looking for Anti-Catholic site when I posted the Google string I used (reading my mind and again against the rules)
4. You continually quoted Vatican.org. False site owned by Canadian.
You can spin this anyway you like it, but I’m so used to watching the alphabet networks that it’s easily seen for what it is, doctored document to spin.
I am constantly amazed that any FReeper thinks s/he can get away with doctoring documents to spin them. Dan Rather and Mary Mapes would be proud.
Again, there are none so blind who WILL NOT SEE.