Those links are some of the sloppies Biblical interpretation I’ve ever seen and they solely rely on propping up an old tradition.
Saying that Jesus is God is illogical and inconsistent and it creates numerous scriptural contradictions.
If Jesus is God, wouldn’t it make sense that those words could be suitably substituted for each other?
If Jesus is God in one place, doesn’t he have to be God in all places?
If Jesus is not God in any single place, how can he be God in any other place?
Just asking.
Ok! If you SAY they are, I guess that they MUST be! :D Hey, you know, I can play this game too, preemptively even: ANY verses that Eagle Eye posts are "the sloppiest Biblical interpretation I've ever seen". There, we're stalemated now.
Saying that Jesus is God is illogical and inconsistent and it creates numerous scriptural contradictions.
APPARENT contradictions yes, if one has not studied the REAL doctrine of the Trinity and not some strawman version thereof.
If Jesus is God, wouldn’t it make sense that those words could be suitably substituted for each other?
What words?
If Jesus is God in one place, doesn’t he have to be God in all places?
Google "hypostatic union".
If Jesus is not God in any single place, how can he be God in any other place?
Ibd.
Just asking.
Do you really want to know the answer? Do the homework I recommended.