What you write is not satire. Also, it is clearly Protestants who have difficulty making proper distinctions here:
1) Several Protestants could not figure out how there could be different kinds of excommunications even after it was pointed out to them. They were unable to make the proper and obvious distinctions.
2) Posting a photo of German clergy giving a Nazi style salute (if that’s even what it was) is not proof of anything other than the fact they gave a Nazi style salute. When asked what case the Protestant poster was trying to make, he refused to even make a substantive reply. Could he make the proper distinctions? Apparently not.
3) Invincible Ignorance is now struggling to make proper distinctions in and about his own statements.
Why are the Protestant posters here so unable to do what you say we can’t do?
“No . . . I’m confident that if a communciations class; a linguistic class; a sociolinguistic class; a psycho-linguistic class were to take on the subject of the Protty vs RC rep ‘discourses’ on FR, there would be some VERY lop-sided statistics rather unflatteringly pointing at very outrageous ROUTINE HABITS of the RC reps very far above and beyond anything similar on the Protty side.”
I don’t think so. As I outlined above, the Protestants here are even having difficulty writing what they actually mean, making rational arguments, answering questions, etc. Also, it is painfully obvious that no matter what a class at a university would decide (and why would you rely on a liberal institution like a modern university filled with ignorant teenagers and left wing profs anyway?) the Protestants have little claim to the truth here.
1) None actually launched any serious refutation of the article at the thread opener or since.
2) Luther was little defended throughout the article.
What a interesting construction on reality.
You have accounted this thread perfectly.