Skip to comments.
UH OH ... NEW SINS FROM THE VATICAN
NEALZ NUZE ^
| Monday, March 10, 2008
| neal boortz
Posted on 03/10/2008 1:04:05 PM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: XeniaSt
Yes, “desecrating the temple of G-d”. I agree.
I think the others on the list can be categorized as sin similarly.
thanks for your reply.
41
posted on
03/10/2008 7:00:15 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Sure botche that one. Let's try it again.
TO: ladyinred
It might be a list for all of us to kinda work at, but for the DNC it is most likely their reminder for list for things to discuss with the Padre during their next confession.
42
posted on
03/10/2008 7:00:59 PM PDT
by
Turret Gunner A20
(If you aren't angry, you're not paying attention.)
To: DungeonMaster
Seen this? "Accumulating excessive wealth" and "pollution" join the ranks of "deadly sins."
The Vatican decries "accumulating excessive wealth" as a sin.
The Vatican ... says accumulating excessive wealth ... is a sin.
It just doesn't get any better than that.
43
posted on
03/10/2008 8:33:20 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Fundamentalist regarding the Constitution and the Holy Bible. Words mean things.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
man this is bizarre
good lord, is the Vatican really this PC.....this sounds more like Unitarians
if this is true, it’s friggin awful
44
posted on
03/10/2008 9:10:45 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Obama: The candidate for those who think Deliverance was a documentary.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
So...if I comminted one of these the day before it was “deemed,” am I guilty?
45
posted on
03/10/2008 9:12:34 PM PDT
by
bannie
(clintons CHEAT! It's their only weapon.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Believe me, we, as Catholics, get the bashing day after day after day.
I just posted a thread defining the seven deadly sins:
pride
avarice (greed)
lust
envy
anger
gluttony
sloth
I’ll put the link in the next post.
46
posted on
03/10/2008 9:51:47 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Turret Gunner A20
47
posted on
03/10/2008 9:52:59 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Turret Gunner A20; All
48
posted on
03/10/2008 11:29:22 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: newgeezer
That should make the masses of RCs happy. This is how they make doctrine, by popular vote.
49
posted on
03/11/2008 5:26:41 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK, AND I USE IT TOO!)
To: newgeezer
The Vatican ... says accumulating excessive wealth ... is a sin. So it's a virtue than?
50
posted on
03/11/2008 11:19:25 AM PDT
by
conservonator
(spill czeck is knot my friend)
To: conservonator
So it's a virtue than?If "accumulating excessive wealth" is a sin, should we look for the Vatican to start divesting its billions any day now?
51
posted on
03/11/2008 12:50:12 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Fundamentalist regarding the Constitution and the Holy Bible. Words mean things.)
To: newgeezer
What does the "Vatican" do with it's alleged wealth? I'm assuming you have the balance sheet and are not simply pulling numbers out of the air...
The problem with mote eyed protestant and "bible" believing types is their inability to see the intellectual paucity needed to put up statements like "If accumulating excessive wealth" is a sin, should we look for the Vatican to start divesting its billions any day now?" The "Vatican" is a city state, city states don't sin, people do. In a hyperventilating rush to condemn the Church, the degenerate, unregenerate, pathetic, church of their own making "Christian", lose all capacity to reason and any ability to see what they would normally claim to be the "simple, self reveling meaning" of some bit of Scripture. Pathetic.
So I ask again; is accumulating excessive wealth a virtue?
52
posted on
03/11/2008 1:11:21 PM PDT
by
conservonator
(spill czeck is knot my friend)
To: conservonator
What does the "Vatican" do with it's alleged wealth?"Alleged?" Puh-leeze. Is the pope Catholic?
53
posted on
03/11/2008 1:44:01 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Fundamentalist regarding the Constitution and the Holy Bible. Words mean things.)
To: newgeezer
I’d ignore the question too.
54
posted on
03/11/2008 1:46:21 PM PDT
by
conservonator
(spill czeck is knot my friend)
To: OpusatFR
“so why is Benedicts edict a problem for everyone else?”
except this was not an “edict” from Benedict at all.
Benedict had nothing to do with this article.
This was a bunch of hullabaloo created by the media after an interview with a vatican official made statements about sin.
He was not trying to do away with any old list - not trying to replace anything with a new list.
He doesn’t have the authority to issue edicts either.
To: conservonator
Id ignore the question too. It was a ridiculous question, and one whose answer you wouldn't care to hear (especially from an unwashed scoundrel such as myself).
56
posted on
03/11/2008 2:05:48 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Fundamentalist regarding the Constitution and the Holy Bible. Words mean things.)
To: newgeezer
It was a ridiculous question, and one whose answer you wouldn't care to hear (especially from an unwashed scoundrel such as myself). It's a perfectly decent and logical question, even an idolatrous Mariophile can see that, BTW, I never said you were unhygienic.
57
posted on
03/11/2008 2:28:29 PM PDT
by
conservonator
(spill czeck is knot my friend)
To: Turret Gunner A20; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
PollutionDidn't the Supremes declare that exhaling pollutes?
58
posted on
03/13/2008 4:24:35 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(March is Liberal Awareness Month.)
To: Libloather
Didn't the Supremes declare that exhaling pollutes?So wouldn't that go: "Stop! Exhaling In The Name Of The Environment" before you wreck the planet.
59
posted on
03/13/2008 6:00:08 PM PDT
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
[Accumulating excessive wealth ]
If accumulating wealth is a ‘sin’, why isn’t sitting on your dead arse and not trying to accumulate wealth?
60
posted on
03/19/2008 6:12:05 PM PDT
by
dbacks
(Taglines for sale or rent.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson