Between your sound refutations of the garbage pouring forth from the ‘Mom’ ron apologists and CG eviscerating the false claims by the insulting apologists, we now have the substance with which to claim, “Sorry, that’s been refuted and found false, fabricated, anti Biblical, anathema to the Gospel of God’s Grace to us in Christ Jesus” every time one of these ‘Mom’ ronism apologists makes one of those long, tedious, demonic posts with useless, empty, condescending claims of ‘proof’ for mormonism.
demonic..boy that word just sums it up very nicely MHG. And notice no sooner had you posted that than Delphi yet again embarks on another demonically inspired useless empty post. Well said!
Key to remember
Joseph Fielding Smith: "Mormonism, as it is called, must stand or fall on the story of Joseph Smith. He was either a prophet of God, divinely called, properly appointed and commissioned, or he was one of the biggest frauds this world has ever seen. There is no middle ground." Doctrines of Salvation, Page 188.
Be it lies about polygamy, translation skills, peep stone scam artist, and volumes of failed/false prophecy, on multiple levels Smith is one of the biggest frauds in world history
Brigham Young: "Take up the Bible, compare the religion of the Latter-day Saints with it, and see if it will stand the test." Journal of Discourses, Volume 16, p. 46, 1873
Again and again, the bible has shown mormonism to be an anathema to solid bible interpretation and doctrine.
Dr. Hugh Nibley: "The Book of Mormon can and should be tested. It invites criticism." An Approach to The Book of Mormon, 1957, p. 13.
The bom has been shown to be an academic fraud. Its apologists acknowledge that the history of the americas is in no way supported by either archaeology, anthropology, linguistic, or geography
"For example, some popular 'Mormon' books show pictures of classic Maya, Inca, and Aztec ruins and attribute them to the Nephites. Scholars are aware that these civilizations postdate Book of Mormon times. Other gross errors include the use of out-dated or otherwise unreliable source materials and the tendency to make every piece of evidence fit neatly into the Book of Mormon picture, whether it belongs there or not." - U.A.S. Newsletter, No. 54, Nov. 19, 1958, p. Z. Dr. Dee F. Green, LDS Archaeologist and the editor of the University Archaeological Society Newsletter at B.Y.U.
In short it is a work of fiction. Since it fails as a document of history - as it claims, it is also a false testimony of Jesus Christ.
Now all we need it the Black Knight from Monte Python to show up and declare a draw.
Like the one just below yours?