Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
#4 is incorrect. A revived Roman Empire would NOT be a group of European nations. The heart of the Roman Empire was Mediterranean nations.

This interpretation is based upon the fact that the current European Union has it's roots in the Treaty of Rome.

Can you elaborate on the interpretation you're presenting?

9 posted on 02/22/2008 6:03:20 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: DouglasKC
If, as the Bible is best interpreted, the 4th kingdom of Daniel is the Roman Empire, which I think it is, then we must look at the actual Roman Empire and not at some European federation.

There is nothing in the bible that says, "European Federation." But, we do know who is the Prince of the people to come....Rome. We do know the 7-hilled city...Rome.

The Roman Empire was primarily the nations of the Mediterranean basin. On the northern shore, now European; on the southern and eastern shores, now Arabic.

Here is a paragraph from an article on the "Barcelona Process" link Interestingly in involves a fledgling union of nations, "The Five Plus Five." (Note: 5+5=10)

It always pays to keep our eyes open and not get hung up on interpretations that are opinions.

The “Five plus Five”The creation of the “Five plus Five” in July 1990—originally estab-lished as the “Four plus Five” and later enlarged to include Maltalater in 1990—was aimed at developing cooperation between Spain,France, Italy, Portugal, and Malta, on the one hand, and Algeria,Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, and Mauritania on the other. Discussiontopics included natural resource management, economic links andfinancial assistance, immigration, and culture. The “Five plus Five”very soon encountered serious obstacles, the most important ofwhich was the international embargo on Libya. The absence ofEgypt, friction between Algeria and Morocco over the Western Sa-hara and Algeria’s internal instability also undermined the initiative.The “Five plus Five” excluded military security discussions from theagenda; in that regard it presented a unique approach and may have --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

14 posted on 02/22/2008 6:26:08 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson