I provided a brief summary of the gist of the article in my comments merely as a convenience.
The link to the original article was provided in the posting itself. Using that link, you can quickly and easily form your own opinion of whether I did a fair job in summarizing the conclusions of the author.
Any misstatements or misquotations in the original article are the fault and responsibility of the person who wrote the story, the persons who edited the story, and the organization who published the story.
I believe it is patently unfair to attempt to blame me for anything in the original article you find untrue or objectionable.
So what's new? The apologists blame us every day for posting things said by their leaders because they find them untrue or objectionable...even though the sources ARE their leaders.
Kill the messenger, sadly, is still in effect.