Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Mormons Saw Romney -- In wooing evangelicals, he made some fellow LDS members uneasy
Newsweek ^ | February 8, 2008 | Sally Atkinson

Posted on 02/19/2008 4:46:10 PM PST by Zakeet

In his pursuit of the presidency, Mitt Romney held fast to his Mormon faith, though his religion remains controversial with evangelicals and some other Christians. But his determined (and ultimately futile) wooing of evangelicals led him to make some statements that didn't quite square with Mormon beliefs and culture. And the effort itself may have deepened the impression of him as inauthentic—even to some fellow Mormons.

Early in his presidential bid, Romney was asked what he thought of polygamy. Prompted by what they considered a divine revelation, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints discontinued the practice more than a century ago, and the church distances itself from polygamist "fundamentalists." But Romney went one step further, saying he couldn't "imagine anything more awful than polygamy." Many Mormons were privately taken aback. Mormons believe that, in its time, "plural marriage" was a commandment from God, and they are, as a group, fiercely proud of their ancestors, hundreds of whom practiced polygamy. (Romney's own great-grandfather had five wives.) LDS church members loathe the polygamy stereotypes and jokes bandied by outsiders. But hearing Romney—the most recognizable face of their faith these days—disavow it in those terms was mildly unsettling to LDS insiders.

Others were puzzled to hear Romney say he reads the Gideon Bible—a version popular with evangelicals: Mormons uniformly study the King James version, in a Salt Lake edition that is cross-referenced to all other Mormon scripture. "Seems like he just figured he had to say the safest, most Protestant thing he could think of—that was kind of annoying," says Russell Arben Fox, a Mormon professor of political science at Friends University in Wichita, Kans.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2008election; lds; mormonism; mormonvote; obsession; pavlovian; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 781-789 next last
To: lady lawyer

We are confident in our religion. We don’t need to go around bashing the religions of others in order to make ourselves feel better. We don’t need to create a common enemy in order to create unity amongst ourselves.
_________________________________________________

I dont believe I have read a comment that stated the Christian bashing by mormons in these threads was to make the mormons feel better about themselves...

However the rate that the mormons spewed their anti-Christian propaganda does seem to suggest that a deep seated lack of confidence in their beliefs may have been in play...

As a Christian with confidence in Jesus Christ. I know that I am only required to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ...

God does not demand that I ram the message down anyone’s throats or call others evil names...or threaten them..

After repeating the Gospel message, and warning you that if you believe in Jesus you will be saved, but if you do not believe on Jesus you will be damned..I have fulfilled all that is required of me...Ezekiel 3:17-21

Then it is up to you to believe or not to believe...Mark 16:15, 16

The “need to create a common enemy in order to create unity amongst” yourselves are your words

I have read no words of the kind from Christians...

Christians know that we will individually stand before Jesus ...That we are individually saved...

There is not family or group salvation...we are saved for our own belief in Jesus not someone else’s...

We just happen to have read the same words in the Bible, and believed them..

Our individual decisions to repent of our sin and be saved, automatically caused us to be knitted together into the Body of Christ..it’s a supernatural thing

I recognize other Christians by the Spirit..

If you feel like you are being ganged up on you need to check yourself out...

Check and see if what you believe lines up with the Word of God, the Bible...

And ONLY the Bible...

Dont look for a “burning in the bosum” Jesus never said there was to be one..


81 posted on 02/20/2008 8:17:19 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; Elsie; MHGinTN; colorcountry; greyfoxx39

Romney’s supporters were the only freepers ever to call me a bigot.


The Romney’s supporters were the only freepers ever to call ME a bigot, too ....

What does that mean ???


People Attacking Mitt are the only ones ever to call me the Devil, a bigot and a servant of the devil on this forum. What does it mean?

It means that people get really involved in politics on this forum and lose perspective sometimes... that’s what it means.
____________________________________________________

No, DU

It means the mormons are on shaky ground in their beliefs, and they have to resort to name calling in order to attempt a smoke screen...


82 posted on 02/20/2008 8:20:51 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All; POWG; alreadythere; Vigilanteman
From the article:

Like any religious or ethnic group, Mormons are loyal to their own.

Well, all I can say is if Evangelicals were ever 90-95% "loyal" to their own with their votes, the raiders of the "bigot patrol" would run roughshod over those folks here and elsewhere. The hue and cry would be tremendous. Accusations of "bias" and "bigotry" and "identity politics" would never cease. (But when it's non-Evangelicals, these same folks grow silent and essentially say, "That's nice." ...Can you say two-faced hypocrisy?)

From the article:

But many Mormons were troubled by Romney's eager wooing of evangelical voters and his efforts to blur the differences between the two groups. "I do think he was attempting to reach out to conservative evangelicals in a way that, as a Mormon, I'm not entirely comfortable with," says Nathan Oman, a law professor at William and Mary. "I don't want us to fall into the trap of trying to present Mormonism as some sort of idiosyncratic brand of Protestantism....Mormons are anathema—not only on theological grounds [but because to evangelicals] there is something uniquely disreputable about being a Mormon. I really don't think there's anything you can say that is going to convince these people to forgive you for being a Latter-day Saint. I didn't see there was any way he was going to get those votes."

For those who have posted on this thread blaming Newsweek for being the source of these comments [POWG, alreadythere, vigilanteman], please note that some lengthy quotes like the above come directly from Mormons.

According to an LDS law professor, "there is something uniquely disreputable about being a Mormon."

Evangelicals didn't create that reputation. It's been around for a long time. And a good chunk of it is simply tied to the founder himself--meaning that for many Mormons, the only thing they've publicly done that's "disreputable" is to lend their very "sustenance" [LDS "sustain" their "prophets"] to a man who claimed that God was his "right hand man"; to a man who claimed he was the only man who ever kept a church together while Jesus and Paul's followers "ran away from them"; to a man who married 9 to 11 women who were already currently married to other men; to a man...

83 posted on 02/20/2008 8:22:36 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

So now you are my judge ????


84 posted on 02/20/2008 8:22:43 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

No, but I know who is my Savior. That’s all that’s required, isn’t it?


85 posted on 02/20/2008 8:26:31 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: lmiller007
Hopefully we who believe in the teachings of Christ, and the values he represents, can get passed the silly sectarianism.

Joseph Smith: “My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)—and which I should join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were ALL WRONG; and the Personage who addressed me said that ALL their creeds were an ABOMINATION in his sight; that those professors were all CORRUPT; that: ‘they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.’ He again forbade me to join with any of them…I went home. …I then said to my mother, ‘I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true.’”

Like this?
86 posted on 02/20/2008 8:37:16 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
We don’t need to go around bashing the religions of others in order to make ourselves feel better. We don’t need to create a common enemy in order to create unity amongst ourselves.

Ummmmmm......have your EVER read the musings of Joeseph Smith Jr? With your kind of cognative dissonance, remind me to never hire you as my lawyer!!
87 posted on 02/20/2008 8:43:28 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic
Let's read a little more of what Joseph Smith wrote about what drove him into the woods to pray about where he should find the truth, shall we?

"Some time in the second year after our removal to Manchester, there was in the place where we lived an unusual excitement on the subject of religion. . . . [G]reat multitudes united themselves to the dfiferen religious parties, which created no small stir and division amongst the people, some crying, 'Lo, here?' and others, 'Lo, there!' Some were contending for the Methodist faith, some for the Presbyterian, and some for the Baptist.

"For, notwithstanding the great love which he converts to these different faiths expressed at the time of their conversion, and the great zeal manifested by the respective clergy, who were active in getting up and promoting this extraordinary scene of religious feeling, in order to have everybody converted, as they were pleased to call it, let them join what sect they pleased; yet when the converts began to file off, some to one party and some to another, it was seen that the seemingly good feelings of both the priests and the converts were more pretended than real; for a scene of great confusion and bad feeling ensued -- priest contending against priest, and convert against convert; so that all their good feelings one for another, if they ever had any, were entirely lost in a strife of words and a contest about opinions."

Joseph Smith correctly recognized that the pure love of Christ didn't exist in that setting. And, to be honest, I never fully understood those paragraphs until I started reading some of the anti-Mormon stuff on FR, posted by "Christians" who saw no irony in being ugly and insulting in order to prove that they are more "Christian" than us Mormons.

88 posted on 02/20/2008 8:49:08 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

Good point!


89 posted on 02/20/2008 8:53:13 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
re: [As a Mormon] I am as much a Christian as you.

Your assertion Mormons are Christian is ludicrous for at least three reasons

FIRST: MORMONISM REJECTS MANY ESSENTIAL CHRISTIAN DOCTRINES

I suggest you check out the article: We're Christians just like you! wherein the author presents a number of well-annotated examples.

If necessary, dozens of additional articles and illustrations can be found on this WEBSITE alone.

SECOND: THE MORMON CHURCH UNEQUIVOCALLY CONDEMNS CHRISTIANS AND CHRISTIANITY

And the angel of God said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth. And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the whore of all the earth, and she sat upon many waters; and she had dominion over all the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people. – Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 14:10-11

My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong) – and which I should join. … I was answered by God that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.” He again forbade me to join with any of themProphet Joseph Smith, Joseph Smith History 1:18-20

Christianity...is a perfect pack of nonsense...the devil could not invent a better engine to spread his work than the Christianity of the nineteenth century. – Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 6, p.167

The Christian world, so-called, are heathens as to the knowledge of the salvation of God. – Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 8:171

Brother Taylor has just said that the religions of the day were hatched in hell. The eggs were laid in hell, hatched on its borders, and then kicked on to the earth." – Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 6:176

Where shall we look for the true order or authority of God? It cannot be found in any nation of Christendom. – Prophet John Taylor, Journal of Discourses, 10:127

Are Christians ignorant? Yes, as ignorant of the things of God as the brute beast. – Prophet John Taylor, Journal of Discourses 13:225

What does the Christian world know about God? Nothing ... Why so far as the things of God are concerned, they are the veriest fools; they know neither God nor the things of God. – Prophet John Taylor, Journal of Discourses 13:225

The Book of Mormon remains secure, unchanged and unchangeable … but with the Bible it was not and is not so … it was once in the sole and exclusive care and custody of an abominable organization (Christianity), founded by the devil himself, likened prophetically unto a great whore, whose great aim and purpose was to destroy the souls of men in the name of religion. In these hands it ceased to be the book it once was. – Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, The Joseph Smith Translation, pp. 12, 13

In bearing testimony of Jesus Christ, President Hinckley spoke of those outside the Church who say Latter-day Saints "do not believe in the traditional Christ.”No, I don't. The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak. – Prophet Gordon B. Hinckley, LDS Church News, June 20, 1998, p.7

If still not convinced, you can find many more similar quotes of Mormon leaders slamming Christians HERE and HERE.

THIRD: THE MORMON CHURCH ITSELF REJECTS CHRISTIANITY

Beginning with Joseph Smith, Mormon prophets have steadfastly proclaimed all Christian denominations were in a state of apostasy.

This raises an interesting question. A heretic is someone who rejects one or more doctrines of religion, but an apostate is someone who has rejected the religion entirely. How is it, exactly, that you can be something you have completely dismissed? How does that work?

90 posted on 02/20/2008 8:56:51 AM PST by Zakeet (Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic; Tennessee Nana
Unless you quote the ENTIRE "vision" you will be accused of "taking that out of context." /s

Here's a link you "should have provided" so that you wouldn't be accused of lying, misrepresenting, or LEAVING ANYTHING OUT. And since I'm not into "leaving anything out," at the link provided below, there are the 10 DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS of the "first vision," so that no one can claim "the" accurate account "hasn't been posted."

Joseph Smith's Changing First Vision Accounts

As to what constitutes the "accurate" account, I guess as of today, the "official version" continues to be the 10th account of 1838.....but, who knows, a super-improved "edited" account could come out.

91 posted on 02/20/2008 8:57:36 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I believe that Christ is my Savior. Therefore, I am a Christian. I do not need to accept all your doctrines and creeds to be a Christian. That is between me and Christ.


92 posted on 02/20/2008 9:02:29 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; Elsie; MHGinTN; colorcountry; greyfoxx39; sevenbak; tantiboh; restornu; ...
No, DU

It means the mormons are on shaky ground in their beliefs, and they have to resort to name calling in order to attempt a smoke screen...


LOL!

Many of you know that because of my Autism, I have an abiding interest in human behavior, and the anlysis thereof.

Leaving religion completely out of it, is it your contention that only one side has ever called names?

OR are you saying that Name calling on the differing sides is caused by different things?

Or are you saying that Both sides are on shaky ground?

I am truly interested on your thoughts here not in rhetoric, we've done that to death. So what is your reasoning?

To the Mormon's I am pinging to this, please do not start a religion debate, we've done that, I want to understand the thoughts behind these comments...
93 posted on 02/20/2008 9:07:54 AM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

ladylawyer. I still hold that your cognative dissonance is amazing. It is clearly understood that the reason Joeseph Smith Jr. started his little religion was that he claimed that God himself told him all current “religions” were an abomination. It was YOUR guy that started this little spat. You apparantly are unwilling to accept this fact. Again...remind me to never hire you as my attorney. Your eyes are too glazed over.


94 posted on 02/20/2008 9:08:25 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

I’ll ignore the ad hominem.

Joseph Smith’s position was no more or no less provocative than the position of Protestantism, generally. There would be no Protestant churches if there had not been a belief that Christianity at that time — i.e. the Catholic Church — had become corrupted.

In other words, you would be a Catholic if your spiritual forefathers had not rejected Catholicism the same way that Joseph Smith rejected the Protestantism which surrounded him. So what?


95 posted on 02/20/2008 9:12:12 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Leaving religion completely out of it, is it your contention that only one side has ever called names?

It is MY contention that Joseph Smith started the "name calling" when he claimed that God himself told him that all religions were "an abomination". The entire LDS doctrine is based on that premise. So...I suggest that you take the age old admonition of...."people who live in glass houses"..........Just sayin'
96 posted on 02/20/2008 9:12:54 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

I believe that Christ is my Savior. Therefore, I am a Christian. I do not need to accept all your doctrines and creeds to be a Christian. That is between me and Christ.
_________________________________________

Jesus said..

The time is fulfilled and the Kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye and believe the Gospel..Mark 1:15

Did you repent ???

Nobody asked you to accept (any additional) doctrines and creeds to be a Christian...

Just as Christians do not believe that our salvation is dependent on a belief in Joseph Smith..


97 posted on 02/20/2008 9:13:42 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: Tennessee Nana

“Nobody asked you to accept (any additional) doctrines and creeds to be a Christian...”

What about your co-religionist who just posted saying that my claim to be a Christian is “ridiculous”?


99 posted on 02/20/2008 9:18:48 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
In other words, you would be a Catholic if your spiritual forefathers had not rejected Catholicism the same way that Joseph Smith rejected the Protestantism which surrounded him. So what?

Even is I were Catholic, my basic doctrine would be the same. And, more importantly, the character of God would not be changed. Mormonism has changed the definintion of the character of God. Your God...your Jesus...is NOT the God or Jesus of the original Christian church, Catholic, or otherwise. That again, is why Joseph Smith said what he said. We were all wrong, and an abomination. Not just a little mixed up. We were all an ABOMINATION. You are free to believe your "restored" gospel all you want. Just be honest in admitting that it is in fact in NO way consistant with "traditional" Christianity. That was the gist of the original article of this thread. Mitt's inability to choose either side of that debate. Mormons were supposedly uncomfortable with his "smoothing" out the edges between the two doctrines.
100 posted on 02/20/2008 9:20:21 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 781-789 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson