[restornu]

Many times a Revelation is given with out any explanation and only after one obeys or disobeys is the understanding clear of that direction.

I guess you’re ignoring my post #72 then. It speaks on prophets and things they claim are revealed to them by the Lord. And it speaks to the Old and New Testament scriptures as to how people are to determine whether or not a prophet is true or false.

***

I don’t suppose it ever occurred to you but the Bible we have is a sanitary version.

We have no diaries or records of minutes of neither meetings nor how or why some revelations were received.

Just a bundle of only 66 books to show for 5000 years on earth.

Had it not it been for Moses we would not have a Readers digest version of the 3000 years before him!

[nicmarlo]

the Bible we have is a sanitary version

According to whom and in what way, specifically, are the Old and New Testaments a "sanitary version"? Which parts of the Old and New Testaments are in error, specifically? Which rabbi scholars of the Old Testament have found it in error? Which scholars of the Aramaic, Greek, and Hebrew languages have declared it substantively interpreted incorrectly into English?

[Elsie]

We have no diaries or records of minutes of neither meetings nor how or why some revelations were received.

And yet, when these same items from LDS, Inc. are quoted from, LDS members get REAL huffy and say, "THEY wuzn't speaking for the Lord then! That ain't our Scripture."