Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: John Leland 1789
Does that mean all English-speaking people world-wide, or only in the States

Look, if basic English is incomprehensible to all English-speaking people, then English should be reclassified as different but related languages. One thing is certain: no one speaks the 17th century version of British English found in KJV.

5,637 posted on 05/17/2008 4:53:34 PM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5630 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50

“One thing is certain: no one speaks the 17th century version of British English found in KJV.”


May I ask what council decided such criteria, that sufficient numbers of people actually use a particular style of Biblical text in their every day speech habits, for that text to continue to be a valid and useful text? Whio made up this rule.

There is another thing also for certain: literally of millions and millions of believers worldwide still sat with an open copy of that 17th century English Bible in their lap this Sunday, and benefited, and grew, and worshipped. I will testify that that 17th century Book still gets the job done today, just as it did in years prior to 1940, when virtually all non-Catholic preachers had that text in their pulpits.


5,649 posted on 05/18/2008 6:22:56 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5637 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson