Posted on 01/26/2008 6:18:21 PM PST by restornu
Ah... nothing but Pure, LDS Organizational Scripture.
The Articles of Faith outline 13 basic points of belief of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Prophet Joseph Smith first wrote them in a letter to John Wentworth, a newspaper editor, in response to Mr. Wentworth's request to know what members of the Church believed. They were subsequently published in Church periodicals. They are now regarded as scripture and included in the Pearl of Great Price.
THE ARTICLES OF FAITH
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS History of the Church, Vol. 4, pp. 535541
Joseph Smith |
At last; a simple compilation of the things that are the main importance to LDS Organization members.
How interesting
Wow
Do they really believe that ???
Where’s the Bible scripture to back this up ??????
Guys, this is a caucus thread.
Unless and until that’s removed, we should respect it.
Sorry, last post should have been to “All.”
Unless and until thats removed, we should respect it.
IMO, Posts #20 & 22 are the only posts which qualify as purely LDS doctrine. Everything else is opinion which is subject to debate.
I have raised an objection to the caucus protection. You should respect that.
In Christ...Alone!
The article begins with "Church" meaning those who share the LDS beliefs. The offending sentence therefore says that the "Church" under that meaning once existed but did not exist for a period of time prior to 1830 - that it was "restored" at that time.
That would make it unambiguous in the context of this particular article.
Several of the non-LDS posters seek to object to the statement as not being factual on the basis of the meaning of the word "Church" - what was being "restored."
Therefore, I shall open the thread but for rebuttal of that point only.
Do NOT turn this into a wide ranging LDS discussion thread. Make your rebuttal respectfully and then leave the thread.
Because the LDS members on this forum are still reeling from the loss of their President, Gordon B. Hinckley - I expect all of you to be on your very best behavior. Consider your remarks as if they are being made to a church assembly in mourning.
I dont mind cordial discussion with those who are without guile that want to inquire having no rancor!.
I had asked you originally to change this from Devoltional to a Caucus because I wanted a civilized discussion which is welcome.
Altering the verse using bold or color to infer or imply an alternant view other than just the plain text is not pure LDS doctrine.
When one starts to use color to give there sarcastic interpretation, that is not pure LDS doctrine it is the poster spin.
By doing this the verses becomes altered changing the doctrine to fit their design.
To get into dialogue with them over this would change the topic of a thread in general.
There are some here who are disingenuous and tries to trash this thread like they practiced on open threads.
Dropping contentious post is not in keeping with civilized dialogue.
When some one posts something like scripture or doctrine it should not be altered to prejudice the question, or to poison the water.
There should be no bold or color scheme or borders it should be just the original unaltered text.
This is why the Caucus is important to prevent those kinds of tactic.
Ask the question using original state of the doctrine.
This alteration can not be controlled on a open threads but should be on a Caucus thread.
I don’t think I am asking too much to have the spirit of civil discourse on certain threads.
I expect all of the non-LDS posters to honor that limitation and post no further challenges, directly or indirectly, e.g. through use of color.
Thank you
By doing this the verses becomes altered changing the doctrine to fit their design.
I truly hope that the words of Our Savior in red do not offend anyone's sensitivities.
With that thought, I shall ABANDON this thread to those who wish to mourn in privacy.
I respect the decision of the RM and will abide by it. However, I will Bold ALL Scripture and will color Red the words of Jesus Christ during my rebuttal and other arguments, as I have done on all my other threads and posts throughout Free Republic.
The color of the text does not change its meaning, it only emphasizes and highlights it for that particular discussion's sake. To bold or color one's text is no different than to italicize it as we do as a prior quote or to simply use "" marks.
In Christ...Alone
I do respect the objection. It was the other portions of posts that treated the thread as open before it was opened (with conditions) that I thought were out of line.
thanks for your reply.
I also will abide by the decision of the Religion Moderator ...
I send my condolences to you all at this time, and I, too, will abandon this thread...
My condolences to the members of the LDS Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.