On the point you just made, yes.
what was the point of all your replies back and forth with me on this subject?
The portion of my previous post that you ignored. This part:
Is it because they’ve done the impossible (”you can not have the perfect, sinless, God-man, inside the body stained with sin”) or is it because they have taken the perfect, sinless, God-man, into a sin stained body?
me: but that portion is irrelavent. because is isnt the idea of ingestion of the eucharist. if one just takes the host and doesnt consume, and does whatever with it, and again, you are not in a state of grace, you are also guilty of the body and blood as well.
you dont have to consume it, it is the state you are in, when you receive it.
YOU:
The portion of my previous post that you ignored. This part:
Is it because they’ve done the impossible (”you can not have the perfect, sinless, God-man, inside the body stained with sin”) or is it because they have taken the perfect, sinless, God-man, into a sin stained body?