Your article didn’t say anything about the election.
That’s a different matter, and so far as I know, few if any abortions are performed in the oval office. As a campaign issue it is simply not relevant.
Someday, maybe soon, roe will inevitably be overturned. Then it will be a fierce issue at the state level. But its relevance at the Presidential level is already pretty much over. Sure, one more judge might be nice, but we probably don’t even need that.
Disagree. A candidate's position on abortion is an indicator of the type of judges he would nominate for the Supreme Court.
And in Rudy's case, he has expressed support for tax-payer funding of abortion, which makes it an even more relevant issue.