Disagree. A candidate's position on abortion is an indicator of the type of judges he would nominate for the Supreme Court.
And in Rudy's case, he has expressed support for tax-payer funding of abortion, which makes it an even more relevant issue.
Nonsense. Even Rudy has said he would nominate good judges that the prolife crowd (of whom I am one) would like. It’s not an issue. Stomping feet and yelling louder doesn’t make it so.
It doesn’t matter anyway. if it came up today, Roe would probably be overturned even with the current court.
There are other more relevant things to use to pick a President. I’m more concerned about Rudy’s (and the others) views on the 2nd amendment.
I don’t ~think~ gun control is going to get much traction as an issue over the term of the next President, and so it may be a moot point as well, but you never know for sure.