To: MHGinTN; metmom
This is what I was explaining about the poster ... the clear try at mischaracterizing what I did write by asserting that I wrote something I didn't write: "Your Assertion here is that all things were not held in common ..."
I asked for Clarification, which this post is not providing...
There was no command from Peter or James or any other to 'sell all and have it held in common' as clearly shown by Peter's instruction to Ananias. But the poster cannot get traction on the clear truth of the scripture passage so he mischaracterizes what someone wrote in order to try and manufacture a controvery there.
I am sorry, but I cannot get the picture of an incompetent lawyer multiplying his words needlessly so no one will know what he was saying, can you explain your understanding of how the Early saints of peter and Ananias' time were living financially?
There, I asked without mischaracterizing anything, I hope.
259 posted on
11/13/2007 12:28:51 AM PST by
DelphiUser
("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
To: DelphiUser
I am sorry, but I cannot get the picture of an incompetent lawyer multiplying his words needlessly so no one will know what he was saying, can you explain your understanding of how the Early saints of peter and Ananias' time were living financially?You're kidding; right??
275 posted on
11/13/2007 5:05:35 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
Doubtless now, you see to what I was referring.
292 posted on
11/13/2007 9:09:06 AM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson