No. I did not bring that up at all. But now that you mention it, that is another good reason.
Hank's business practices and the manner in which he wrestled control of CRI are not shining examples of good Christian ethics. Go to the Walter Martin website and find out why Hank Hannegraff is not a man to be trusted.
I went there but saw nothing about Hank. Where would I find this?
Just a reminder that Walter is dead and the web site is run by some of his apparently unhappy children.
“Hank’s business practices and the manner in which he wrestled control of CRI are not shining examples of good Christian ethics.”
Because you disagree with him on eschatology doesn’t necessarily mean his business practices are subject.
As I said, CRI, which is his organization, has the highest rating from Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability. So if his business practices were suspect, I highly doubt he would get that rating from them.
You can go to their website and look him up. It’s all there.
I repeat: unless and until he’s actually found guilty of something, I don’t believe it’s right to slander a fellow Christian. Time will tell if he’s actually found guilty of anything.
I don’t know Hanegraaff as a person, but his biblical knowledge is well respected by most scholars, though he does seem to have a lot of enemies from the Word-faith movement and dispensationalists.
The link you posted did.
But now that you mention it, that is another good reason.
No, it isn't. Slander cases are extremely difficult to win. Otherwise, every political candidate or other public figure would be constantly suing someone because they knew they could win.
Hank's business practices and the manner in which he wrestled control of CRI are not shining examples of good Christian ethics. Go to the Walter Martin website and find out why Hank Hannegraff is not a man to be trusted.
I went to that site and didn't find anything negative about Hank there. (Of course, I didn't spend hours searching it either.) Please post the link to the specific page you are expecting me to look at, and please make it a page that has actual evidence, not accusations.