[Antoninus]

Would you agree that the problem was rape and inhospitality as much as homosexuality?

Nice try. That's the standard homo-theology argument for that passage. Not buying, pal.

[dangus]

>> That’s the standard homo-theology argument for that passage. Not buying, pal. <<

Careful, Antoninus. Clearly, the homo-theologians’ argument is nonsensical; while the demands for rape were horrifying to Lot, the fact that they were homosexual rapists was even more horrifying, as evidenced that he offered his daughters up instead.

But don’t make it seem like you are asserting that the rape aspect was secondary.

[Unassuaged]

“Nice try. That’s the standard homo-theology argument for that passage. Not buying, pal.”

A round earth, sun-centric world was the standard anti-christian argument (some who said this were gay as well) at one time, most have bought that one, however.