[Antoninus]

So in other words, had Rowling made the statement about Dumbledore a few weeks ago it would have saved him from reading books 1 thru 5?

Not reading, reviewing. I already reviewed books 1-5. I won't bother to review the last two. As is clear from the article above, I've already read them.

[Non-Sequitur]

So back to the original question, had you known then what you know now would you have bothered to read them at all? Or would the ‘butt lust’ connection have turned you off completely?

[humblegunner]

As is clear from the article above, I've already read them.

Good for you, so have I.

I thought they were great books.

Dumbledore wasn't gay in the books, only after the fact
did this emerge, perhaps as an afterthought. Plus, he's dead.

And fictitious.