Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did I Really Leave the Holy Catholic Church?
Christian Truth ^ | 1994 | William Webster

Posted on 09/28/2007 6:20:54 AM PDT by Ottofire

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 821-836 next last
To: Ottofire

Yeah. I realize that. I was just in a hurry to post and get somewhere. I could have explained myself better.

Thanks for posting.


61 posted on 09/28/2007 12:37:33 PM PDT by HeadOn (Hey kids - Learn to think instead of prepping for the test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; MarkBsnr; BlackElk
How can this be a GRPL ping when it is mostly about the Catholic Church?

You must have forgotten the sarcasm tag.

Sheesh.

62 posted on 09/28/2007 12:41:50 PM PDT by Petronski (Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
Wonderful! You have discovered the beauty, reason for and the great gift that is the Magisterium! No individual man is the arbiter of truth, even the Pope, when he speaks "ex cathedra" is speaking nor for him self and his opinion but is proclaiming a universal, transcendent truth held by the Church, and expressed in councils teaching of fathers etc, not an opinion

The teaching or opinion of an individual member of the Church no matter who that individual may be is not dogma, unlike the opinions of Protestant ecleasial community founders.

63 posted on 09/28/2007 12:54:41 PM PDT by conservonator (Be always offering your self to Him who Is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
This is a summary of guidelines that were used in determining the canonicity of the books of the Bible.

And on whose authority were said guidelines promulgated? The Jewish/Protestant OT canon was decided at Jamnia in AD 90 -- the same council that rejected the entirety of the NT writings written to that point. Not an authority I care to give credit to or trust.

The Apocrypha, those books included in the Roman Catholic Canon, were never quoted in the New Testament.

Did you look at the link that I posted?

2. The Old Testament books were endorsed by Christ and Paul.
3. The New Testament quotes all but seven of the Old Testament books.

My point exactly with the link. If Christ, St. Paul, and others quoted/referenced the Deuterocanon (what you call the 'Apocrypha'), then that gives quite a bit of support to suggest they should be canonical.

64 posted on 09/28/2007 1:22:40 PM PDT by GCC Catholic (Sour grapes make terrible whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
the Apocrypha, those books included in the Roman Catholic Canon,
were never quoted in the New Testament.

65 posted on 09/28/2007 1:27:42 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Ottofire; xzins; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; 1000 silverlings
Did I Really Leave the Holy Catholic Church?

I did not. I actually identified with the holy catholic church after leaving Romanism since I now truly understood the words of that ancient creed.

AMEN, TC!

66 posted on 09/28/2007 1:36:35 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dangus; Ottofire
Well, once again, someone writes about his past in the Catholic Church as if to validate that he truly knows Catholicism, yet he acknowledges he left the Church in the state of woeful disobedience. Contrast that to the converts to Catholicism, who study history and the bible so thoroughly and zestfully that they can no longer remain Protestant.

Do I understand you to say that those who have left the RCC, including Priests and Nuns, have all done so for the wrong reasons and those who have converted to Catholicism are all well educated, saintly, and have done so for all the "right" reasons?

Do you claim any kind of objectivity for yourself?

67 posted on 09/28/2007 1:42:01 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; topcat54

My Dad also left the RC church. He’s never looked back.


68 posted on 09/28/2007 1:46:21 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten; Ottofire
Very interesting article. I’m becoming fascinated with the writings of the earliest church fathers (ie, prior to 100 AD) because in those writings are the thoughts of the people who knew Jesus themselves, and the thoughts of those who studied at their feet.

Take care that you not be caught up in early fiction.
69 posted on 09/28/2007 1:56:01 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Take care that you not be caught up in early fiction.

Why, are later fictions superior?

70 posted on 09/28/2007 2:24:14 PM PDT by conservonator (Be always offering your self to Him who Is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Not true
71 posted on 09/28/2007 2:31:05 PM PDT by conservonator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
Why, are later fictions superior?

Maybe some are. :)

Some of the fictional writings of Ignatius (early Church Father) are pretty good.

Maybe it would have been better if I had made it clear that I was making reference to purported writings of the Early Church Fathers which are clearly fictional.

72 posted on 09/28/2007 2:54:42 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: conservonator
Not true

Did you ever review this for correctness or did you just cut and paste ?

I sampled only a dozen and it says that newer books preceded older books or some of the words were the same but it was not a quote.

What a fraud !


73 posted on 09/28/2007 2:54:58 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Dr. Eckleburg; topcat54
I have met several people who remain RC but do not attend any church and are stunted in their christian walk because of it. The reasons they have given are varied and include birth control, pedophilia, liberal practices, and so on. They refuse to attend anywhere else because they are Catholic and believe there is only one church. They count on their baptism and the prayers of their families to save them.

I hope this was not the case with your Dad, xzins.

74 posted on 09/28/2007 2:56:19 PM PDT by suzyjaruki (Why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

If this crap is the Church, then Christ is not God. If Protestantism is the true Church, then there is no God at all.

I've been thinking about your statement since I first read it five or six hours ago. I didn't reply at first because I didn't want to fly off the handle. But now that I've calmed down, I want to point out a couple things.

First, "Protestantism" is not a church. Protestants see the "church" (used in the general sense) as the Body of Christ, the members of which are Christians. And however obnoxious some Catholics on this forum may be, I would never say that we have no need of their parts of the body (1 Cor. 12:12-26).

You've gone a step further. Not only do you have no need of other parts of the body, but you've declared that if this "crap" is the Church, there's no God. You want to mock or write off as "crap" the faith of more than half of all Christians.

Second, this is the difference I see when I talk to Roman Catholics or read their remarks here: It's all about their church -- their institution -- not Christ. It's all about "welcome home," rah-rah, ka-ching, we've got another one for "our side." It's not about winning someone to Christ, it's about winning one for the "real" team. Your focus is frightening. I almost never encounter this in Protestants or members of the Orthodox faith.

75 posted on 09/28/2007 3:39:44 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle; jacero10
Second, this is the difference I see when I talk to Roman Catholics or read their remarks here: It's all about their church -- their institution -- not Christ. It's all about "welcome home," rah-rah, ka-ching, we've got another one for "our side." It's not about winning someone to Christ, it's about winning one for the "real" team. Your focus is frightening. I almost never encounter this in Protestants or members of the Orthodox faith.

One of the claims of the Catholic Church is that we hold the Deposit of Faith in its entirety, as much as was revealed by God, and the authority to proclaim, teach, and protect it. And so anyone who is outside of it might well be participating in the life of Christ, thus making him or her a Christian; even so, without being a member of the Catholic Church, that Christian is living a life that is lacking.

For a Catholic to not rejoice when one enters the Catholic Church and not have sadness when one leaves is to deny that we have that fullness. It is about Christ, because we not only desire all to have Him, but to have Him in His fullness.

76 posted on 09/28/2007 3:51:46 PM PDT by GCC Catholic (Sour grapes make terrible whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle

I dont think you know many Orthodox. They feel the same way about their Church as Catholics do about ours.

I should and do apologize. I got overheated. But, my mind has not changed.

God became incarnate in the person of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ dwells in his Church. The Church is not a bunch of people who come together because they each believe in Christ. The Church is an organic unity in which Christ dwells and is manifest in his sacraments (which are other forms Christs manifestation).

The church cannot be created. The Church is given to humanity at pentecost. It is not a club or voluntary association. It is not a legal entity. It is Christ’s body carried to each generation through the laying on of hands of clergy and the baptism of the faithful. Its unity is organic, real, visible.

It is not your churches which are unworthy of respect, but you idea of church that is so impoverished that it excuses the historical and real mess the reformation has made of things. Every time protestants make a mess, they invent a new theology to excuse it. Gay theology is just the latest example of this.

Protestant ecclesiology is first of all a misnomer. And, secondly, it is just wrong. By spiritualizing the church as some entity known only to God that included the true believers or the saved or whatever you comfort youselves in your folly and utter rejection of the unity that Christ prayed for.

The zillions of Protestant Churches are the origin of relativism and thus are responsible for the ongoing breakdown of Western Civilization.


77 posted on 09/28/2007 3:56:52 PM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Glenmerle

It should also be noted that Protestants are the majority of US citizens. However, they are only about 1/3 of Christians. Othodoxy numbers roughly 1/10 of Christians and Catholics, about 6/10 of Christians.


78 posted on 09/28/2007 3:59:10 PM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Ottofire

Good Article. He has another on his website regarding the truth about Roman “Tradition” that also is quite enlightening.


79 posted on 09/28/2007 5:00:19 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
Actually, they both referenced some books only existing in the Septuagint, that did not exist in the Tanach:

And what does that prove??? It proves that the Mythical LXX written by the Mythical church that the Septuagint copied the writings of the Apostles, the scriptures...

80 posted on 09/28/2007 5:27:04 PM PDT by Iscool (Was the doctor that would have found the cure for cancer aborted as a baby???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 821-836 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson