Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: tantiboh
You assume that polygamy is necessarily adultery because we consider it to be so today. That is not an historical truism.

Smith had sex with wives of other men. That is adultery under any standard; not just polygamy.

215 posted on 09/27/2007 11:24:34 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

~”Smith had sex with wives of other men. That is adultery under any standard; not just polygamy.”~

Smith was -sealed- to wives of other men. (And it is fundamental to this discussion to understand the difference between sealing and marriage.) It’s not clear to me as to why; but there were purely dynastic arrangements made in some cases. Whether or not there was sexual intimacy between Smith and wives of other men is not substantiated by reliable evidence. We have a few secondhand accounts and claims, but no more.

The question then becomes, if there is no sexual intimacy in the relationship, is it adultery?


235 posted on 09/28/2007 6:49:10 AM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson