Posted on 09/12/2007 9:56:39 AM PDT by NYer
What IS modern Episcopal theology? I went on their website and couldn’t find anything other than some squishy social justice stuff that no one would disagree with.
Well, you have to do your doctorate on some miniscule point in the subject. And at least squid and oysters are tasty and nutritious!
I think Id prefer to read Dicks half-mad, recursive ramblings than Shorris for entertainment. Then Ill look to the Bible and Godly men for truth.
Dick was defiantly a loon, but an entertaining one.
Aren't they all? Sigh!
Thanks for the ping. I escaped in time.
Bingo!
The Church as a whole resists having an articulable dogma. One of the things that lead me to leave was when a layman asked me for a book that had an authoritative account of what TEC believes and teaches and I realized there wasn't one.
This link will tell you all you need to know about ECUSA “theology.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBfKYFQHcg0
BTW, yes there are a few conservative Episcopalians left, but they are holding out for property. Funny, they are in the same position as faithful Catholics were in Tudor England. Catholic priests were lucky if they just avoided slaughter and these guys want to take their property with them. If they get their property, there are a few thousand churches and grand Cathedrals in England which rightfully belong to Rome!!
I found it on Google - will have to locate entry
Once upon a time, I could have passed an easy test on the subject.
By human calculation, a thousand ages taken together is the duration of Brahmas one day. And such also is the duration of his night.When Brahmas day is manifest, this multitude of living entities comes into being, and at the arrival of Brahmas night they are all annihilated.
Again and again the day comes, and this host of beings is active; and again the night falls, O Partha, and they are helplessly dissolved.
Yet there is another nature, which is eternal is and transcendental to this manifested and unmanifested matter. It is supreme and is never annihilated. When all in this world is annihilated, that part remains as it is.
Bhagavad-gita 8:17-20, Bhaktivedanta translation.
God is a “dream”? OKie dokie........good thing she left.
What on earth?!?
My only exposure to Hindu doctrine was a free copy of "The Bhagavad-gita As It Is" by whoever the Hare Krishna head honcho was at the time. That, and Kipling (who grew up in primarily Muslim territory anyhow.)
Ping. The presiding priestess’s address at Union is garnering some discussion here, and I didn’t see where you all had been pinged yet.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail Huber or sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (sometimes 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by Huber and sionnsar.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor: The Anglican Blue
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
The New World Order feminazi heretic Katharine Jefferts-Schori (NWOFHKJS?) is no theologian, and is totally un-original. She just lifts the concept of “the dream of God” from the “progressive Christian” horde, especially Marcus Borg:
http://www.ird-renew.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=fvKVLfMVIsG&b=399595&ct=3286097
Another member of the “dream of God” crowd is the lesbian Episcopal activist Susan Russell. The way that I heard of the “dream of God” was that the ELCA propaganda magazine “The Lutheran” had an article by Borg a few months ago. It figures.
What is the progresives’ so-called “dream of God?” It is a world of “social justice”, which we are called to help build. If that is all that God is about, then Barabbas was right, and Jesus was wrong. But Jesus rejected the role of social revolutionary, went to the Cross, died for our sins, conquered death and Satan, and will come again to bring a new heaven and a new earth. It is God who builds His Kingdom, not us. And the “kingdom” that the progressives want to buiid is not God’s Kingdom, but the brutal, tyrannical New World Order!!!!
Trade us/me to where? The church of fairy-tale believing, polytheistic Pharisees of the current candidate you're currently supporting to be POTUS?
That's what I thought. I actually found a liberal Episcopal blog and it was about homos, homos, homos.
Okay, that was fabulously vituperative, but unclear.
When I was a priest in that Church, I wanted to teach and proclaim NOT my opinion but what the Church taught, about God ‘n Jesus ‘n stuff. It seems that all they now have a the “ ‘n stuff”, and the “God ‘n Jesus” part is sort of fading into the background. My seminary just sent out a “journal” with a whole bunch of writing about a “Theology of Water”, which came down to: Filthy Capitalists are ruining and selfishly using the worlds water while AIDS victims are thirsty — or something along those lines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.