Actually, no, it is a matter of history. I challenge you to check it out.
Ignorant prejudice does nothing for me. If you have some real facts, (by that I mean no Jack Chick type fantasies) post them. I’m also not interested in your opinion but if you have real facts, by all means, I’m interested.
Oh yeah and I’m not interested in your own personal interpretation of scripture which is already colored by your own personal bias. I want you to show me how the early church was historically and liturgically different than it is today. That it believed something different than it does today.
“I want you to show me how the early church was historically and liturgically different than it is today”
This early church? The one with no popes, no priests, no rituals save baptism and communion, no Mary worship, no indulgences, no say five hail marys and you’re forgiven til next time, that church? As for “apostolic liturgy” see Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the words in red.
Act 2:42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
Act 2:43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
Act 2:44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
Act 2:45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
Act 2:46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,
Act 2:47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
Or the one that has added to the requirements given by Christ.