No, I’m stating that telling us that Sola Scriptura is absolutely correct is not what Catholics believe.
So we don’t call Our Lord a liar, you call us that.
But we don’t need to smile about it either.
So we don’t call Our Lord a liar, you call us that.
But we don’t need to smile about it either.
Wideawake, where are you???
Madam, I shall endeavor to control my temper. Unfortunately, you don't seem to have read a word I wrote. I said absolutely nothing about "sola scriptura." As a matter of fact, I don't even believe in sola scriptura!!!
There. Did you read that? Did you understand that? You seem to have an eye condition that causes you to misread my posts.
I attacked the Catholic Church for not believing in total Biblical inerrancy. This is a completely different concept than "sola scriptura." "Sola Scriptura" (which you and I both reject) says that the Bible is sufficient. It is not. However, it contains no mistakes or errors of any kind on any topic. That is what is meant by total inerrancy.
Now, do you understand that?
"The Bible is sufficient" is wrong.
"The Bible is totally inerrant on every subject is correct.
Ironically, you've just proven my claim that most modern Catholics tend to confuse sola scriptura with total inerrancy.
So now that you've proven my point even while arguing against it, is there something humorous you care to say to distract the reader?