Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 06/15/2007 1:02:32 PM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:

Locked at poster’s request



Skip to comments.

The ABSOLUTE Primacy of Christ
Irish-Catholic and Dangerous ^ | April 12, 2007 | Danny Garland, Jr.

Posted on 06/13/2007 4:39:26 AM PDT by fr maximilian mary

Franciscan (Scotistic) Thesis: Absolute Primacy Of Christ -Jesus Christ was absolutely predestined for grace and glory in His Incarnation quite apart from any question of sin. The elect (men and angels) were chosen and predestined in Him by an eternal decree. And this before the universe had been created.

Supporters of this:

-St. Maximus the Confessor: “This [the Incarnation] is that great and hidden mystery. This is the blessed end for which all things were created. This is the divine purpose foreknown before the beginning of creation… Really, it was for the sake of Christ, that is the mystery of Christ, that all the ages and all the things of all the ages themselves received the beginning and end of existence in Christ.”

-St. Francis De Sales: The primary reason for the Incarnation was that God “might communicate Himself” outside Himself (ad extra). From all eternity He saw that the most excellent way to do this was in “uniting Himself to some created nature, in such sort that the creature might be engrafted and implanted in the divinity, and become one single Person with it.” Thus God willed the Incarnation. Through Christ and “for His sake” God willed to pour out His goodness on other creatures thus choosing to “create men and angels to accompany His Son, to participate in His grace and glory, to adore and praise Him forever.”

-St. Albert the Great: In his commentary on the Sentences he writes, “to the extent that I can offer my opinion, I believe that the Son of God would have become man even if there had been no sin… Nevertheless, on this subject I say nothing in a definitive manner; but I believe that what I said is more in harmony with the piety of faith.”

Bl. John Duns Scotus:

The absolute primacy of Christ begins with God’s plan. So we can say that it begins from above, and not from below (from man). It begins with God. Scotus seeks to see the created world form God’s point of view. And God, he would hold, does not subordinate His eternal decrees to man’s temporal situation. God rather in His goodness, freely wills to create the universe according to a fixed plan.

The key note to Scotus’ system is the word "predestination"

Note the distinction again from a Calvinist predestination: God has a fixed plan for creation, but man is still free. For Scotus, the origin of all creation rests on predestination. Scotus defines Predestination as "An act of divine will which destines (chooses or elects) an intellectual creature to grace and glory." Predestination is characterized by 2 activities:

1) eternal: the eternal act outside of time. This refers to the intention of God for all eternity. This specifically refers to the activity of "determining the end." Meaning determining the goal or purpose or final cause of all of God’s activity outside of Himself.

2) temporal: " The Execution of His foreseen plan in time." This means the gradual realization of His eternal plan in time.

-Therefore, we have a single plan of predestination with 2 activities that bring it about. Intention and execution. The intention which God freely chooses from eternity always precedes the execution of His intention in time. The example used by Scotists is that of a sculptor. First the artist sees in his mind a life-size wooden statue (say, of Sacred Heart of Jesus) and he wants to carve this wooden statue.

The first thing the sculptor does is have an intention to carve the statue. Now to execute that intention, he obtains a large chunk of wood. He brings it to a studio and begins to carve. What we can see in this process is that the intention is first and the execution is second, and in a certain sense we can say that the execution (the chunk of wood) is less perfect compared to what the final statue would be (the more perfect). But the sculptor throughout the process sees the Sacred Heart of Jesus in that wood. That intention is what moves the execution of the plan along. So in the sculptors activity of intention, the perfect is willed and is seen first. Whereas, in the activity of execution, he begins with the less perfect and gradually moves to the perfect.

Applying this to subject of primacy of Christ: God is the divine artist. The first thing he does is wills and predestines the Most sacred Heart of Jesus to the maximum grace and glory as possible. This maximum grace in glory is by virtue of the personal union that the human heart of Jesus will have with the eternal Word in the Incarnation. This happens through the hypostatic union. Now through the activity of the intention God wills the end of all creation; The goal and height of all creation: Jesus Christ.

To get to this goal of all creation, God sets his plan in motion (the execution), with the creation of the universe. God moves from the lesser perfect to the most perfect realization of his eternal decree. (Chunk of wood to the actual statue). That’s why he starts with creation. The most perfect of his eternal decree is the grace and glory of Jesus Christ. (Scotus says that Scripture supports this. Jesus is the high point of creation.) Thus the Sacred Heart of Jesus is the first created being willed by God and was done so for all eternity and the Sacred Heart is predestined to the height of Glory. The Sacred Heart is the goal of all creation. What God seeks to realize in the fullness of time (Gal 4:4). So this eternal intention of God and the temporal execution towards this end, is what is fixed by predestination. Secondly, all other rational creatures are predestined in, thru, and for Jesus Christ.

The predestination is the positive act of the divine will which destines a rational creature to grace and glory. This refers first to Jesus Christ in his humanity, and also to all the saints and angels.

For Scotus predestination is absolute, not relative, meaning that it is not relative to any created need or circumstance. Rather it is based on God’s own intrinsic goodness and moving creatures to himself for the optimum grace and glory.

Christ was willed (Incarnation) before the foundation of the world (cf. Eph. 1:4). Jesus is first of all willed for His own sake and not first for man’s sake. In fact, men and angels are created for Him and He for God (cf. I Cor. 3:23). Jesus could not be predestined to grace and glory on account of sin....even though he will conquer sin in his mercy. Thus the Incarnation is the supreme work of God ad extra (outside of Himself) and it is not occasioned by sin. This predestination of Christ, of men, and of angels is one simultaneous act. So God destines all of the elect to grace and glory in Jesus Christ.

In Scotus’s Ordinatio he says:

1) God predestines Christ (in His humanity), saints and angels to glory before any foreseen sin.

2) Predestination is absolute in the intention of God and not based on future needs or sins of creatures.

3) Thirdly that Christ’s absolute predestination could not be "occasioned by sin" or even for the sake of men and angels.

a) After willing the Trinity, the first thing that God wills is the humanity of Jesus.

b) You don’t predestine the height of created glory based on the fall of an inferior creature.

Consequently, this is the view I hold. It also has implications for the Blessed Virgin as well, which I will post on at a later time.

In the meantime, Tom over at Disputations has started a discussion on the subject... Make sure you check out the discussion in the combox. You will find that Fr. Maximilian Mary Dean, F.I. has joined the discussion. Note what he says, for he wrote the book on this subject......literally! It's called A Primer on the Absolute Primacy of Christ.

Be sure to check out Fr. Maximilian's vlog series on this subject at AirMaria.com.

by Danny Garland Jr. at Irish-Catholic and Dangerous


TOPICS: Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Orthodox Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: aquinas; incarnation; redemption; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 last
To: Alex Murphy
I don't think anyone's disputing that point. The problem here is that, according to the article, your Bl. John Duns Scotus claims (or the author, claiming on his behalf), that the Trinity itself - the divisions of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit - was the first thing that God created.

That is terrible theology, and violates the nature and attributes of God as immutable and eternal

161 posted on 06/15/2007 10:55:54 AM PDT by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Danny Garland Jr.
I say, nevertheless, that the Fall is not the cause of Christ’s predestination. Indeed, even if one angel had not fallen, or one man, Christ would still have been predestined thus—even if others had not been created, but only Christ. This I demonstrate thus: anyone who wills methodically first wills an end, and then more immediately, those things which are more immediate to the end. But God wills most methodically; therefore, He wills thus: first He wills Himself, and everything intrinsic to Himself; more directly, so far as concerns things extrinsic, is the soul of Christ. Therefore, in relation to whatever merit and before whatever dement was foreseen, He foresees that Christ must be united to Him in a substantial union...”
The “willing of himself” is meant I suppose in the way Fr. Maximilian Mary explained. Love is of the will and God loves Himself.
I also agree that this discussion should focus on the Incarnation of Christ and His Absolute Primacy and the implications thereof.

Do you believe that God is all knowing? Do you believe that God has perfect foreknowledge?

If that is the case how could God NOT KNOW that men would fall?

162 posted on 06/15/2007 11:04:39 AM PDT by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fr maximilian mary; 1000 silverlings; pjr12345; fortheDeclaration; P-Marlowe; ears_to_hear; ...
The Holy Bible, the Word of God, says that henceforth all generations shall call Mary blessed.(Lk. 1:48).

"BLESSED," one syllable.

Not "bless-ED," with the accent on the second syllable.

God blessed Mary by making her the mother of Jesus Christ.

However, she is no less a sinner than any of us. She required a savior like you and I. And nothing in Scripture gives Mary a retroactive pass from before her birth.

The concepts of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary are anti-Scriptural fantasy which literally feminizes the church and further erodes the concept of Trinitarian Fatherhood.

The foundation of Marianology is found in the history of the cult of Cybele and the cult of Isis. One and the same.

"The Cult of the Virgin Mary: Psychological Origins"
by Michael P. Carroll

163 posted on 06/15/2007 11:21:21 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; fr maximilian mary; 1000 silverlings; pjr12345; fortheDeclaration; P-Marlowe; ...

“BLESSED,” one syllable.”

It is the same word used to describe the condition of all in the Kingdom of God as Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount. The verb form is what is used to bless the bread and cup for communion or the multiplying of the bread for the feeding of the 5,000. Either way, the “blessing” was not special to Mary.


164 posted on 06/15/2007 11:36:45 AM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration; 1000 silverlings; Dr. Eckleburg; blue-duncan; pjr12345; P-Marlowe; ...
"Learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart." (Mt. 11:29)

"A new commandment I give you, that you love one another: that as I have loved you, you also love one another. By this will all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (Jn. 13:34-35).

165 posted on 06/15/2007 12:22:49 PM PDT by fr maximilian mary ("Imitate Jesus, love Mary as your Mother." Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr maximilian mary

Who’s the guy with the beard?


166 posted on 06/15/2007 12:34:24 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
He's somehow married to this person


167 posted on 06/15/2007 12:39:53 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Matthew 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: fr maximilian mary

All too often those in error push “the love of God” to deflect any criticism of their teachings. It’s basically the “can’t we all just get along” tactic, or perhaps the “love will keep us together” one.

Let’s look at what Jesus said about loving Him:

John 14:15 — If you love Me, keep My commandments.

If you truly love Christ, denounce the false doctrines of the RCC. I suggest you begin with mariology.


168 posted on 06/15/2007 12:44:34 PM PDT by pjr12345 (I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord! Romans 7:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: fr maximilian mary
"Ye that love the LORD, hate evil: he preserveth the souls of his saints; he delivereth them out of the hand of the wicked.

Light is sown for the righteous, and gladness for the upright in heart.

Rejoice in the LORD, ye righteous; and give thanks at the remembrance of his holiness." -- Psalm 97:10-12

"Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good." -- Romans 12:9

169 posted on 06/15/2007 12:50:35 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: fr maximilian mary
"A new commandment I give you, that you love one another: that as I have loved you, you also love one another. By this will all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (Jn. 13:34-35).

Amen.

Wherefore rebuke them sharply that they may be sound in the faith (Tit.1:13)

170 posted on 06/15/2007 12:54:09 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

I think these are my great grandparents, as my mother has their picture hanging in the hallway.


171 posted on 06/15/2007 12:57:26 PM PDT by pjr12345 (I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord! Romans 7:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: ears_to_hear
If that is the case how could God NOT KNOW that men would fall?

Amen. The more we read Scripture, the more we understand there is no time limit in the past to God's predestination. He is the beginning and the end of ALL things.

No man can fully grasp this truth. Who could? But our inability to understand completely does not negate the fact of who God is and what "sovereign Creator" means.

All that exists is by the perfect will and predetermining, creative decree of God. For Christians, this is part of the good news of the Gospel -- Christ, the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

172 posted on 06/15/2007 12:58:31 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Amen to your post.


173 posted on 06/15/2007 1:00:02 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345

I saw them as a kid. People were tougher back then, the hearts were all bloody, took up the whole chest cavity.


174 posted on 06/15/2007 1:02:10 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Matthew 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson