[vladimir998]

You wrote:

“It appears the claim was false on several counts. You didn’t link to the banned website, the article does not appear on the list of articles at the banned website and the content does not source back to the banned website by google.”

First, and foremost, I just found the whole William Webster article at Jesus-is-Lord.com. Here is the link: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/roman_catholic_salvation.htm

Second, go to post #356. That was the one addressed to me. I never saw the article otherwise. I cut and pasted quotes from it and they showed up on google.com as being from Jesus-is-Lord.com

Here again is the William Webster article as posted at Jesus-is-Lord.com: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/roman_catholic_salvation.htm

If you couldn’t find it, then I don’t know how I could.

[xzins]

Second, go to post #356. That was the one addressed to me. I never saw the article otherwise. I cut and pasted quotes from it and they showed up on google.com as being from Jesus-is-Lord.com

You responded in #353 to her #352 in which she posted the Webster article and link. How can you say you "never" saw the article otherwise?