Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

You wrote:

“Henry was no reformer because he did not follow reformation doctrine.”

He was a “Reformer”, just not very Protestant in doctrine. Again, just as Protestant killed one another even though they all supposedly shared some same doctrines, Henry kept some things very Catholic, robbed and murdered like a Protestant Reformer, and slowly became more Protestant in doctrine late in life. Those are the facts.

“He was much more a rebellious catholic as both his pre and post break with the rcc reveals. The pope, as you’ll recall, declared him to be “the defender of the faith.””

In 1521, yes! Yet, you ignore what he did in 1544. Just as the “Reformers” actually became more Portestant over time (Luther, for example, believed in a Purgatory of a sort until 1529 or so), so did Henry.


316 posted on 06/01/2007 8:16:55 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998; Dr. Eckleburg; ears_to_hear; P-Marlowe

The teachings of the reformation were listed early in confessions such as the Geneva Confession in the early 1500’s. Henry erred at many points.

He was not a reformer.


320 posted on 06/01/2007 8:23:25 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson