Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

***Vanity***Harrisburg Diocese Cathedral To Reinstall Tabernacle to Center Of Altar - Thoughts?
May 3, 2007 | franky1

Posted on 05/03/2007 11:37:36 AM PDT by franky1

The Harrisburg Diocese Cathedral Church, St. Patricks of Harrisburg, PA is moving the Tabernacle back to its original center of the altar according to Fr. John Trugilio. He made the statement on the Fr. Mitch Pacwa EWTN show last night.

Also, according to my parish Church's secretary, in same Diocese, is to put back altar railing.

Thoughts!


TOPICS: Current Events
KEYWORDS: trigilio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Has anyone heard of any changes in their Church or Diocese?
1 posted on 05/03/2007 11:37:39 AM PDT by franky1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: franky1

That’s the parish where they have the Traditional Latin Mass, so that’s not surprising.


2 posted on 05/03/2007 11:40:16 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky1

Oops, the Traditional Latin Mass is held in the Cathedral Chapel of St. Lawrence, which near the Cathedral of St. Patrick.


3 posted on 05/03/2007 11:43:48 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Interesting! If the bishop’s own church is doing this, perhaps there are wider implications. After all, one of the excuses for moving the tabernacle off to the side or in a separate chapel was that the priest in the Novus Ordo Mass has his back to the tabernacle when he says Mass versus populum. Wouldn’t it be nice if this is a signal that the bishops have all gotten advance notice of the wording of the interminably delayed motu proprio, and that it is mandating an ad orientem posture for the priest in both the TLM and the Novus Ordo?


4 posted on 05/03/2007 11:48:37 AM PDT by magisterium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: franky1

pics:

http://www.stpatrickcathedral.com/st%20pats.html


5 posted on 05/03/2007 11:49:55 AM PDT by Nihil Obstat (Kyrie Eleison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat; franky1; magisterium
http://www.hbgdiocese.org/Admin/Uploads/Homepage/Cathedral/Restoration/Cath%20PowerPoint.pdf (Warning: 6 MB file)
6 posted on 05/03/2007 11:57:49 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: magisterium
Wouldn’t it be nice if this is a signal that the bishops have all gotten advance notice of the wording of the interminably delayed motu proprio, and that it is mandating an ad orientem posture for the priest in both the TLM and the Novus Ordo?

It would! But it's unlikely that BXVI will take such a dramatic step as "mandating" it when he already said that it could be disruptive to have such a dramatic break.

7 posted on 05/03/2007 12:11:03 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: franky1

awesome news!


8 posted on 05/03/2007 12:28:34 PM PDT by rogernz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky1

Well that’s certainly interesting news! Good news, too, of course.

But could this mean that other changes are in the offing?


9 posted on 05/03/2007 12:30:20 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

When did he say that? I know he has said just that with regard to scrapping the NO altogether, but I don’t recall anything from him saying the ad orientem posture would be a disruptive break. If anything, I recall his lamenting the use of versus populum as something he wishes had never been started.


10 posted on 05/03/2007 12:37:02 PM PDT by magisterium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: magisterium
If anything, I recall his lamenting the use of versus populum as something he wishes had never been started.

He said that too! LOL

I'l try and find the quote (anyone know where to find it?), but the way I remember it he basically said that we really should go back to ad orientem but that if it proves too jarring for the congregation, then there should at least be a symbolic turning toward the east by putting a crucifix on the altar that the priest can face.

11 posted on 05/03/2007 12:43:32 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: magisterium

Found the quotes:

http://www.adoremus.org/0500-Ratzinger.html

Some excerpts:

“On the other hand, a common turning to the East during the Eucharistic Prayer remains essential. This is not a case of accidentals, but of essentials. Looking at the priest has no importance. What matters is looking together at the Lord. It is not now a question of dialogue, but of common worship, of setting off towards the One who is to come. What corresponds with the reality of what is happening is not the closed circle, but the common movement forward expressed in a common direction for prayer....”

“A more important objection is of the practical order. Are we really going to re-order everything all over again? Nothing is more harmful to the Liturgy than constant changes, even if it seems to be for the sake of genuine renewal....Where a direct common turning toward the East is not possible, the cross can serve as the interior “East” of faith. It should stand in the middle of the altar and be the common point of focus for both priest and praying community.”


12 posted on 05/03/2007 12:52:06 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: magisterium

Found the quotes:

http://www.adoremus.org/0500-Ratzinger.html

Some excerpts:

“On the other hand, a common turning to the East during the Eucharistic Prayer remains essential. This is not a case of accidentals, but of essentials. Looking at the priest has no importance. What matters is looking together at the Lord. It is not now a question of dialogue, but of common worship, of setting off towards the One who is to come. What corresponds with the reality of what is happening is not the closed circle, but the common movement forward expressed in a common direction for prayer....”

“A more important objection is of the practical order. Are we really going to re-order everything all over again? Nothing is more harmful to the Liturgy than constant changes, even if it seems to be for the sake of genuine renewal....Where a direct common turning toward the East is not possible, the cross can serve as the interior “East” of faith. It should stand in the middle of the altar and be the common point of focus for both priest and praying community.”


13 posted on 05/03/2007 12:52:09 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Oops...sorry for the double post.

It’s actually a little less “soft” than I portrayed it... he says where a common turning toward the East is *not possible*...(nothing in there about pastoral reasons).

But he does concede that too many sudden breaks in liturgical form is not a great thing, and he also points out that moving the altar out has allowed the recovery of the ancient tradition of having it at the crossing of the nave and the transepts. If his thinking is the same now he probably won’t mandate Ad orientem., though he *does* seem to regard it as what should be the normative form.


14 posted on 05/03/2007 12:58:50 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: franky1; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; ...
Official Web Site
15 posted on 05/03/2007 1:06:42 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

OK.

BTW, the altar crucifix placement during a NO Mass is interesting to me. The pastor who has recently been assigned the Indult Mass in our archdiocese has taken to putting a crucifix on the altar during his Novus Ordo Masses. I’d bet nearly anything, though, that as soon as he even gets a sniff of “permission,” he’ll be doing both the TLM and the NO right up there at the high altar (which, providentially, was never destroyed in the zeal for “modernization” back in the ‘70’s). As it is, he’s putting a new altar rail in for us traddies ASAP.


16 posted on 05/03/2007 1:16:27 PM PDT by magisterium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Fr. Trugilio was speaking about the 100th anniversary Mass on May 14.

http://www.stpatrickcathedral.com/Events.pdf


17 posted on 05/03/2007 1:48:59 PM PDT by franky1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: magisterium

Excellent! There’s a NO parish near us where the pastor told me flat out he is just waiting for the motu so he can have the old Mass.

They too use an altar crucifix at every Mass...interesting, these priests out there in the woodwork laying low and just needing a little support from Rome!


18 posted on 05/03/2007 2:38:37 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: franky1

Harrisburg Diocese Cathedral Church FTW!!!!


19 posted on 05/03/2007 3:18:07 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky1

Most appropriate for Christ the King to be enthroned there so all can worship Him!


20 posted on 05/03/2007 3:31:37 PM PDT by Macoraba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson