Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54

Like so many of your posts, topcat, the opportunity exists for you to offer something constructive, but instead suppose everybody owes you something.

Your responding post insisted you already knew everything about the Hypostatic Union and not once have you offered anything constructive in comprehending its meaning other than claiming you are an expert to judge everybody else.

Before one can learn, one must exercise some humility. You’ve tipped your hand by first pretending you didn’t know anything about the Hypostatic Union, then claimed you know it all. Since you know it all, I need not do your homework for you as I previously did.

Just think of all the missed opportunities you had to grow with Him when you had such direct interaction with so many leading brethren, but now resort to attacking them.


27 posted on 04/14/2007 10:33:39 AM PDT by Cvengr (The violence of evil is met with the violence of righteousness, justice, love and grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Cvengr
Like so many of your posts, topcat, the opportunity exists for you to offer something constructive, but instead suppose everybody owes you something.

Hmmm, you subtly accuse me of being out of fellowship with God because I'm not a dispensationalist ("might simply return to God through faith in Christ"), and now I'm supposed to be "constructive”?

And your first post back at #23 starts off with this highly debatable comment, “and still nobody has been able to disprove Scripture as interpreted from the view point of dispensational ages.”

How is that being constructive?

This is rich. Methinks someone has a log in their eye.

Your responding post insisted you already knew everything about the Hypostatic Union and not once have you offered anything constructive in comprehending its meaning other than claiming you are an expert to judge everybody else.

I still have no clue how the doctrine applied to the subject we were discussing, and you never answered by question about how it applied. Is that being “constructive”?

Before one can learn, one must exercise some humility. You’ve tipped your hand by first pretending you didn’t know anything about the Hypostatic Union, …

I never pretended anything. And you never answered my question. Are you too proud to do so?

I'll accept your honest answer anytime. And I'm quite prepared to discuss the merits and deficiencies of dispensationalism. You know where I can be found.

29 posted on 04/14/2007 10:48:55 AM PDT by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- like crack for the eschatologically naive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson