Hmmm, you subtly accuse me of being out of fellowship with God because I'm not a dispensationalist ("might simply return to God through faith in Christ"), and now I'm supposed to be "constructive”?
And your first post back at #23 starts off with this highly debatable comment, “and still nobody has been able to disprove Scripture as interpreted from the view point of dispensational ages.”
How is that being constructive?
This is rich. Methinks someone has a log in their eye.
Your responding post insisted you already knew everything about the Hypostatic Union and not once have you offered anything constructive in comprehending its meaning other than claiming you are an expert to judge everybody else.
I still have no clue how the doctrine applied to the subject we were discussing, and you never answered by question about how it applied. Is that being “constructive”?
Before one can learn, one must exercise some humility. You’ve tipped your hand by first pretending you didn’t know anything about the Hypostatic Union, …
I never pretended anything. And you never answered my question. Are you too proud to do so?
I'll accept your honest answer anytime. And I'm quite prepared to discuss the merits and deficiencies of dispensationalism. You know where I can be found.
Yes,..but I don't visit Purgatory that often...;^)
The angelic domain indubitably watch the efforts of man to prolong this world and delay His 2nd Advent. Every knee will bow and his enemies will be made his footstool. At the bema seat, I suspect you might be given opportunity to further understand why ages have been appointed, although it also exists now, whereas later no reward is handed out to those who reject it.