Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"It is Written: Sola Scriptura"
The Highway ^ | Richard Bennett

Posted on 03/30/2007 11:03:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

"It is Written: Sola Scriptura"

 

"My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me" John 10:27.

By Richard Bennett

 

 

 

 

SCRIPTURE ALONE IS INSPIRED AND INHERENTLY AUTHORITATIVE.

The Biblical message breathed out by God is revelation in written form. (2 Timothy 3:15-16). The Biblical claim is that what God has inspired was His written word (2 Peter 1:20-21). When the Lord Jesus Christ said, "the Scripture cannot be broken" (John 10:35), He was speaking of God’s written word. The events, actions, commandments, and truths from God are given to us in propositional, i.e. logical, written sentences. God’s declaration in Scripture is that it and it alone, is this final authority in all matters of faith and morals. Thus there is only one written source from God, and there is only one basis of truth for the Lord's people in the Church.

 

THE TRUTH AND THE SCRIPTURE

The Lord Jesus Christ, in His great high priestly prayer, declared clearly the truth of God's Word. He said, "Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth." This was consistent with the declarations right through the Old Testament in which the Holy Spirit continually proclaims that the revelation from God is truth, as for example Psalm 119:142, "thy law is truth." The Lord Himself therefore identified truth with the written Word. There is no source other than to Scripture alone to which such a statement applies. That source alone, the Holy Scripture, is the believer’s standard of truth.

In the New Testament, it is the written word of God and that alone to which the Lord Jesus Christ and His apostles refer as the final authority. In the temptation, the Lord Jesus three times resisted Satan, saying, "It is written" as for example, in Matthew 4:4, "he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." In stating "It is written," the Lord used the exact same phrase that is used in the Holy Bible forty six times. The persistence of the repeated phrase underlines its importance. The Lord's total acceptance of the authority of the Old Testament is evident in His words found in Matthew 5:17-18, 

"Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fulfil. For verily, I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled."
 

OTHER SOURCES OF AUTHORITY CONDEMNED

Furthermore, in refuting the errors of the Sadducees, the Scripture records the Lord saying, "Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God" (Matthew 22:29). Christ Jesus continually castigated and rebuked the Pharisees because they made their tradition on a par with the Word of God. He condemned them because they were attempting to corrupt the very basis of truth by equating their traditions to the Word of God. So He declared to them in Mark 7:13 "[You are] making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such things do ye." Since Scripture alone is inspired, it alone is the ultimate authority and it alone is the final judge of Tradition.

The Word of the Lord says as a commandment in Proverbs 30:5,6 "Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." God commands that we are not to add to His Word: this command shows emphatically that it is God's Word alone that is pure and uncontaminated.

Aligned with Proverbs, the Lord’s strong, clear declaration in Isaiah 8:20 is: "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." The truth is this: since God’s written word alone is inspired, it¾ and it alone¾ is the sole rule of faith. It cannot be otherwise.
 

THE EXPRESSION "SOLA SCRIPTURA"

From the time of the giving of the Decalogue on Mt. Sinai, when Holy God wrote with His finger on the tablets of stone (Exodus 31:18), until this present day, the written word of God has been extant in the world. The term "sola Scriptura" or "the Bible alone" as the measure of truth is short hand, as it were, for the emphatic and repeated statements of Scripture and of the commandment of God. The very phrase " It is written" means exclusively transcribed, and not hearsay. The command to believe what is written means to believe only the pure word of God. It separates from all other sources the corpus what a man is to believe. What is at stake before the All Holy God is His incorruptible truth.

In the very last commandment in the Bible God resolutely tells us not to add to nor take away from His Word. 

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book" (Revelation 22:18-19)

His Word is absolutely sufficient in itself. (Psalm 119:160)
 

THE PRESCRIPT AND INTERPRETATION

The principle of "sola Scriptura" is consistent with the very way in which the word of truth that comes from God, is to be interpreted, as Psalm 36:9 explains, "For with thee is the fountain of life; in thy light we see light". God's truth is seen in the light of God's truth. This is exactly the same as the Apostle Paul says, "Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth, comparing spiritual things with spiritual" (I Corinthians 2:13). It is precisely in the light which God's truth sheds, that His truth is seen. (Cp. John 3:18-21, II Corinthians 4:3-7.)

The Apostle Peter, under the impulse of the Holy Spirit, declares, "knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation. For prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" (2 Peter 1:20-21). Logically then, Peter makes it very clear that in order to maintain the purity of Holy God's written word, the source of interpretation must be from the same pure source as the origin of the Scripture itself. Scripture can only be understood correctly in the light of Scripture¾since it alone is uncorrupted. It is only with the Holy Spirit's light that Scripture can be comprehended correctly. The Holy Spirit causes those who are the Lord's to understand Scripture (John 14:16-17, 26). Since the Spirit does this by Scripture, obviously, it is in accord with the principle that Scripture itself is the infallible rule of interpretation of its own truth "it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth" (I John 5:6).

Those truly desiring to be true to Lord in this very matter of the standard of "sola Scriptura" must turn to the Lord to obey His command, "Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you" (Proverbs 1:23). If one is yearning of truth in this essential matter, in the attitude of Psalm 51:17 "with a broken and a contrite heart", the Lord God will not despise, but reveal to him or her the basic foundation where the Lord Christ Jesus stood, as did the apostles. In the words of the Apostle John, "This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true." (John 21:24). The Apostle John wrote, as did Peter and Paul, in order that those who are saved should know that his testimony is true
 

THE ADEQUACY OF SCRIPTURE

The total sufficiency of Scripture is declared by the Apostle Paul, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." (2 Timothy 3:16-17). For final truth and authority, all that we need is the Scripture.
 

THE CLAIM THAT SOLA SCRIPTURA WAS NOT POSSIBLE

In an attempt to justify a tradition as an authority, an appeal is often made to the very last verse in John's gospel where it is stated, "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen". (John 21:25) Of course there were many of the deeds and sayings of the Lord, which are not recorded in Scripture. Scripture is the authoritative record that Holy God has given His people. We do not have a single sentence that is authoritatively from the Lord, outside of what is in the written word. To appeal to a tradition for authority when Holy God did not give it is futile. The idea that somehow sayings and events from the Lord have been recorded in tradition is simply not true.

Another desperate attempt to justify tradition, is the statement that the early church did not have the New Testament. The Apostle Peter speaks about the writings of the Apostle Paul when he states, "even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction" (2 Peter 3:15-16). Peter also declares that he was writing so that the believers could remember what he said. So he wrote, "Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth" (2 Peter 1:12).

From the earliest times a substantial part of the New Testament was available. Under the inspiration of the Lord, the Apostle Paul commands his letters to be read in other churches besides those to which they were sent. This clearly shows that the written word of God was being circulated even as the Apostles lived. The Lord's command to believe what is written has always been something that the believers could obey and did obey. In this matter we must have the humility commanded in the Scripture not to think above what is written. "that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another" (1 Corinthians 4:6).
 

THE REGULATION AND OUR LOVE OF GOD

The Lord brings the topic of truth to bear on our love for Him. This again underscores its importance. "Jesus answered and said to him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings; and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent Me" (John 14:23-24). And then again "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words shall not pass away" (Matthew 24:35).

The Lord himself looked to the authority of the Scriptures alone, as did His apostles after Him. They confirmed the very message of the Old Testament. "The law of the LORD is perfect" (Psalm 19:7). The believer is to be true to the way of the Lord, holding alone to what is written: "Thy Word is truth."




TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: solascriptura
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261 next last
To: Iscool

Sorry, I should have pinged you to 116.


121 posted on 03/31/2007 11:35:23 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Gamecock
If it comes down to (and it does come down to) choosing between Scripture and the musings of a man-made magisterium, I'll choose Scripture.

By the grace of God alone. Aren't we fortunate, Alex, to know that the Holy Spirit is indeed leading our walk home?

122 posted on 03/31/2007 11:38:22 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Petronski
Aren't we fortunate, Alex, to know that the Holy Spirit is indeed leading our walk home?

I suspect the spirit "leading" someone to post #88 is not the Holy Spirit.

123 posted on 03/31/2007 11:54:24 AM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Religion Moderator
REN & STIMPY -- one of the all-time greats!

DON'T TOUCH!!!

124 posted on 03/31/2007 12:01:31 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Tut, tut, tut. Evading the question once again, and seemingly flirting with Gnosticism, too. You have not shown how. I get that you have special knowledge and a special state that only those who have the Holy Spirit can attain. And, of course, all who have it know it. And if you don't know it, then the Holy Spirit isn't there. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

The approach of comparing verse to verse has given the world millions of different interpretations of Scripture, as well as muddying the message and garbling its contents. Christ commanded Peter and the Apostles to go to the world baptizing in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. He certainly didn't say that anyone who happened to be standing by should do it as well. Therefore, one must be trained to do so.

He also told them that they had the power to forgive or to not forgive sins. He certainly didn't say that at some point in time that they couldn't do it anymore, so there is no reason to think that that practice stopped. But again one must be trained to do so.

We have the story of the eunuch and also the words of Peter that people were not to read scripture without proper training. One must be trained in order to provide the training.

Our trained people are labeled priest (after the Greek presbutos) and bishop (again from the Greek).

On the contrary, we find the Protestant (and all non Catholic) practice to be unbiblical, heretical, and full of hubris.

I have asked this question a few times in the Religion forum and I ask it again: How many here kneel in prayer? How many kneel before God? The Papists are well represented.

The earliest Christians wore symbols of their faith, such as the Chi-Rho, the Anchor, the Good Shepherd, and, of course, the Crucifix / Cross. Do you wear a symbol of your faith?

Falling down before the trunk of a tree? It is Jesus Christ himself who humbled himself to die upon a Roman cross. I do not fall down before a tree. I kneel before God, and bend my stiff neck. The Crucifix is a remembrance of what He has done. I am not ashamed. I am humbled before Him. Do you practice anything like that?

If not, why?

125 posted on 03/31/2007 12:04:49 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Titanites; Alex Murphy

Maybe it's good that RCCs feel uncomfortable when mention is made of that particular part of their past and present.

I know I'd sure feel uneasy believing something so profoundly unScriptural.


126 posted on 03/31/2007 12:05:04 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Petronski
Maybe it's good that RCCs feel uncomfortable when mention is made of that particular part of their past and present.

What makes "RCCs" feel uncomfortable is not the mentioning of it, but the manner it which the mentioning was conveyed. We are known by our fruit.

127 posted on 03/31/2007 12:11:06 PM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
God forbid I fall down to the stock of a tree. There is not a lie in my right hand.

I agree with Paul...

"I know whom I have believed." -- 2 Timothy 1:12

And I agree with John Knox who clearly stated the problem Rome has in reading the Scriptures with any amount of clarity or discernment since Rome encourages men to presume incorrectly that there are mediators between men and God besides Jesus Christ...

"That God's word damns your ceremonies it is evident; for the plain and straight commandment of God is, 'Not that thing which appears good in thy eyes shalt thou do to the Lord thy God, but what the Lord thy God has commanded thee; that do thou; add nothing to it; diminish nothing from it.' Now unless you are able to prove that God has commanded your ceremonies, this his former commandment will damn both you and them." -- John Knox (Knox, Works, 1:199. Cf. Calvin, The Necessity of Reforming the Church, in Tracts, 1:128-29.)

Repent.

128 posted on 03/31/2007 12:13:14 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Titanites

And the fruit of your belief was removed from the discussion because apparently it made some people uncomfortable.

That's probably a good thing. Men should feel uncomfortable with idolatry.


129 posted on 03/31/2007 12:15:10 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Somebody is leading you somewhere, that's for sure.

Jesus left the mechanism of the forgiveness of sins in the hands of trained men. If you reject that, are you rejecting the forgiveness of your own sins?

Jesus commanded us to eat His Body and drink His Blood. Are you following his command?

Jesus gave us the Beatitudes. Do you practice them?

Jesus knelt in prayer before the Father. Do you?

Jesus gave us Mary while on the Cross - Mother, behold, your son. Son, behold your mother - do you reject this too?

Jesus fasted. Do you?

Jesus left us His Church in the hands of those trained men. Do you accept and follow Her?

So, just like receiving the password and grip of a secret society, you're in like Flint? Poof. Except that you don't really have to conform to any rules except those you choose to follow and in the manner you choose to follow them?

Geez, you guys are like wannabe Johnny Cochranes or F. Lee Baileys. Always looking for an angle or a new twist on things. Just give it up, and swim the Tiber. It's getting cleaner every year. :)


130 posted on 03/31/2007 12:18:23 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Umm, John Knox isn't in my (whole, unabridged) Bible.

Humbling myself before God is.


131 posted on 03/31/2007 12:19:41 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Men should feel uncomfortable with idolatry.

They should not practice it at all. Including the self-idolatry preeminent in the new non-denominational churches, complete with rock stars and mob emtion.

132 posted on 03/31/2007 12:24:05 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr
Thank you for the ping!

I am not anti-Catholic, I am pro-God.

And I do not believe any particular doctrine or tradition of men has the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth.

The very thought of it is ridiculous to me - because mortals can never see "all that there is" from God's perspective - only what He wants us to know.

I expect to see lots of different "labels" in heaven!

More directly, to the challenge posted, i.e. how to know a person is led of the Spirit, I propose these might be good questions to ask ourselves:

What do my words - and especially my actions - say?

Is anything as important as God (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) to me?

If I had to give up every loved one, every possession, every thing - right here and now - would I have any reservation or hesitation?

Who do I believe?

Who do I trust?

Do I love those who hate me?

Do I love everyone else, both in word and in deed?


133 posted on 03/31/2007 12:32:10 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
God forbid I fall down to the stock of a tree. There is not a lie in my right hand. I agree with Paul...

"I know whom I have believed." -- 2 Timothy 1:12 And I agree with John Knox who clearly stated the problem Rome has in reading the Scriptures with any amount of clarity or discernment since Rome encourages men to presume incorrectly that there are mediators between men and God besides Jesus Christ...

"That God's word damns your ceremonies it is evident; for the plain and straight commandment of God is, 'Not that thing which appears good in thy eyes shalt thou do to the Lord thy God, but what the Lord thy God has commanded thee; that do thou; add nothing to it; diminish nothing from it.' Now unless you are able to prove that God has commanded your ceremonies, this his former commandment will damn both you and them." -- John Knox (Knox, Works, 1:199. Cf. Calvin, The Necessity of Reforming the Church, in Tracts, 1:128-29.) Repent.

Since I don't normally lie with my right hand(I prefer my wife) :), I'll merely have to point back to the fact the Jesus calls His Church the Pillar of Truth and commands us to go to Her for teaching and instruction. Whatever your interpretation of Paul (and I don't read it the same as you - your inclusion of this as evidence of your viewpoint seems to go back to existence of the little voices again), I'll have to go with Christ's words, which are very plain and very direct.

By the way, how about explaining them away, instead of merely ignoring them and/or giving me back duelling verses?

Ashamed of Christianity now, are we? Too proud to kneel? Tsk, tsk. Unbiblical!!!

134 posted on 03/31/2007 12:32:55 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Hi there, nice to see you again. I agree that doctrines and traditions of men do not have the Whole Truth. I think that all Catholics are with you there.

What do my words - and especially my actions - say?

Is anything as important as God (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) to me?

If I had to give up every loved one, every possession, every thing - right here and now - would I have any reservation or hesitation?

Who do I believe?

Who do I trust?

Do I love those who hate me?

Do I love everyone else, both in word and in deed?

Excellent questions that perhaps all of us could and should ask of ourselves. But how do they show that the Holy Spirit is alive and well and living in us?

With the exception of belief in the Trinity, I'd say that Mahatma Gandhi was a much better Christian than I am. And I'm sure that there are people who act much more grossly than I do that are better, and those who act more piously are worse. I'm sorry, but I don't see the answer here.

135 posted on 03/31/2007 12:40:41 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; Dr. Eckleburg
Jesus left the mechanism of the forgiveness of sins in the hands of trained men

It would never, ever have crossed my mind to refer to Christ's blood as a mere "mechanism...in the hands of trained men". Such a statement is as offensive to me as others claim my post #88 was to them. But not to worry! IMO Christ can (and has) forgiven any offensive parts found in both.

136 posted on 03/31/2007 1:07:45 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
With the exception of belief in the Trinity, I'd say that Mahatma Gandhi was a much better Christian than I am.

IMO that's a sad comparison to make - I'm guessing you're more familiar with the film than the real man. I'd recommend you check out Richard Grenier's The Gandhi Nobody Knows as a start to learn more about the real man.

137 posted on 03/31/2007 1:13:52 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

138 posted on 03/31/2007 1:54:35 PM PDT by Frank Sheed ("Shakespeare the Papist" by Fr. Peter Milward, S.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
And I agree with John Knox...

You forgot the part about "and he can beat the crap out of Sts. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Catherine of Siena, Francis of Assisi, Lawrence of Brindisi (oh, on second thought, I wouldn't go there!)...

;-o)

139 posted on 03/31/2007 1:59:45 PM PDT by Frank Sheed ("Shakespeare the Papist" by Fr. Peter Milward, S.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed

140 posted on 03/31/2007 2:02:07 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson