Read what I said: The RC's added to scripture as a result of Luther.
"Read what I said: The RC's added to scripture as a result of Luther."
For all its faults, The Church is the Divinely inspired and Divinely established Bride of Christ.
If the books that had been in existence long before Luther appeared were added at Trent it is because the Church was Divinely inspired by the guidance of the Holy Spirit Himself to include them.
Luther served his purpose. He just did not serve it the way he was supposed to do; namely, work within the Church to change, not create a false doctrine and establish a heretical schism.
Again, good day to you.
I read it. I read it like four or five times. It wasn't any truer the last time than it was the first. How many times does it need to be read before it stops being a misstatement?
In related news, what is the purpose of this thread? Judging by the original article and photos I guess it was a nonsense thread. I suppose it could be kind of a Prot pep rally thread but since it starts by attacking the Pope and the Papacy it can't qualify for Caucus status. But since the article is way too biased to change anyone's mind, well, I just don't get it ...
Or how about this? It's a contest: who can give the most outrageously one-sided statement of a controversial point of view.
Wow, I must digest this one piece at a time.
The RC's added to scripture. The Church of Christ decided under the guidance of the Holy Spirit what the contents of the Holy Bible would be 1200 years before Martin Luther existed.
as a result of Luther The Church never changed one iota of content as a result of Luther. I would be fascinated to hear what your information source is and what their agenda is, as well.