The problem with scenario #2 is that it requires direct or indirect communion with heretics. For three years or so I have been reading these threads and I still fail to understand the Anglican tolerance for heresy in its midst.
K, we've discussed this issue many times as you know. Things move much slower in the Anglican world than they do in the Orthodox... but I will be blunt and say that as an Anglican I too "oppose scenario #2" (and more). This proposal goes well beyond our inherent Entish nature and into accomodation -- and I am quite surprised, given the source.
I hope this is nothing more than a misstatement by Mr. White, but I confess to having a grave concern over this.
I agree completely. The author seems to forget the place of Church discipline, specifically commanded in the New Testament.
Moving towards and finally actual excommunication accomplishes one of two things: It either removes the infectious false brethren, OR (preferably) causes real backslidden brethren to repent...in essence saving their souls.
Either one of these results is a good thing, in the first, the Church is protected from wolves in the midst, in the 2nd, individuals disciplined are actually rescued from the precipice of Hell itself.
I don't understand why orthodox Anglican Prelates don't seem to get this...