Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
When discussing a religion more than 3,000 years old, couldn't a 200 year old sect be called "new."

So are you suggesting that the Hassidic movement is not Judaism?

16 posted on 02/15/2007 3:38:44 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

I think I pretty clearly suggested it was "new." A Jewish movement can be "new" and still be Jewish. Having said that, however, I should point out, that I think some of the cultural tendency of Hassidism are more particularly Hassidic than generally Jewish.

Have you forgotten that orthodox Jews opposed Hassidism? Ever hear of Elijah ben Shlomo Zalman? Isn't the only reason why the Hassidic Jews and Orthodox Jews get along today because of the threat against both from the Haskala movement at one time?


21 posted on 02/15/2007 5:58:58 PM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson