Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Vicomte13

Perhaps a third possibility, however improbable, also exists . . .

That God, while deploring the Marianolatry, has such fierce compassion on those seeking His help . . . that He grants such.

Personally, I'm more inclined to think that some demonic involvement is at least quite plausible.


603 posted on 01/30/2007 1:32:57 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE & HIS ENEMIES BE 100% DONE-IN; & ISLAM & TRAITORS FLUSHED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
Personally, I'm more inclined to think that some demonic involvement is at least quite plausible.

I disagree, or healings would be commonplace. Satan could have all of us worshipping #2 pencils (name your common object of choice) if he had that kind of power.

611 posted on 01/30/2007 1:50:00 PM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies ]

To: Quix

"Perhaps a third possibility, however improbable, also exists . . .
That God, while deploring the Marianolatry, has such fierce compassion on those seeking His help . . . that He grants such.
Personally, I'm more inclined to think that some demonic involvement is at least quite plausible."

This is a very good post, thank you.
It's good for a number of reasons.

First, you implicitly acknowledge that something remarkable does go on at Lourdes. That's true. There's a scientific committee there to study it, and the dossiers every year are thick with real healings. So, you're operating from facts and trying to fit the facts into a theological pattern. This is good. Pretending something doesn't exist which does exist is bad. And you didn't do that.

Second, you presented an option which is possible. You don't like the option, but you know with God all things are possible, so you say that it is possible. This is good too, against because it is theologically true.

Third, you present your favored view, which fits your theology. This is the point of your post, and you do it without impugning my motives for having asked the question or doing an end-zone dance.

Fourth, you acknowledge that you really don't KNOW for sure, and therefore you DON'T take a strict, certain, and possibly erroneous stand.

I appreciate this sort of response.


614 posted on 01/30/2007 1:56:20 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson