So, if there is a reasoned response which answers the assertions of the Roman Catholic position you are uninterested, because you have been convinced by one side of the argument...is that correct?
"So, if there is a reasoned response which answers the assertions of the Roman Catholic position you are uninterested, because you have been convinced by one side of the argument...is that correct?"
I don't think there is any response that can overcome the illogic of sola scriptura. Proving that Scripture is the sole rule of faith by referring to Scripture is illogical on its face.
"Proving that Scripture is the sole rule of faith by referring to Scripture is illogical on its face."
I need to re-phrase that - Asserting that Scripture is the sole rule of faith..."
What about the first 400 years, when Christians had no New Testament? What was their rule of faith? For the Canon was not decided until the Council of Carthage in 397. Without the authority of the Catholic Church, there is no Canon. "I would not believe a word of the Gospel unless moved thereto by the authority of the Church." (St. Augustine) There simply is no other reason to believe Scripture.