Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: syriacus
Isn't the author of Revelations referring to adding or subtracting words from the Book of Revelations, rather than referring to adding or subtracting from the other books of the Bible?

That's the reasonable interpretation, yes, since "The Bible" as we know it did not exist at the time of the composition of the Book of Revelation.

49 posted on 01/06/2007 12:44:54 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Everything is either willed or permitted by God, and nothing can hurt me." Bl. Charles de Foucauld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
"The Bible" as we know it did not exist at the time of the composition of the Book of Revelation.

Thank you for providing the explanation.

60 posted on 01/06/2007 1:45:43 PM PST by syriacus (If 3000 deaths is an indication to "cut and run" Truman, would have abandoned Korea in 5 weeks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

yes, but also the wording specifically used by John " adding or subtracting words from this SCROLL...", which is of course the medium upon the text was written. specifically, then, John is arguing that no-one should change the words in the Book of Revelation itself.


71 posted on 01/06/2007 3:01:13 PM PST by haole (John 10 30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson