Posted on 01/02/2007 7:02:03 PM PST by sionnsar
Quite a stretch on the lame duck Bishops part. Why couldnt he just have denied the request? Oh, and hes also vacated the Vestry and is taking over St. Johns parish. Looks much like Bishop Smiths actions in Connecticut.
The release comes from here. Here is the text:
December 27, 2006
Last week the Office of the Bishop received a letter from David Miller, and an attorney representing David Miller and St. Johns Church in Petaluma, California.David Miller requested Letters Dimissory to the Diocese of Argentina in the Province of the Southern Cone, under the jurisdiction of The Most Reverend Gregory James Venable. I have declined to send Letters Dimissory for David Miller to the Diocese of Argentina. When, and if, David Miller physically moves to Argentina, the question of sending Letters Dimissory will be revisited.
I have chosen to view David Millers letter of December 17, 2006 as a request to renounce orders in this church. This action was laid before the clerical members of the Standing Committee on December 26 and 27. They concurred with my acceptance of David Millers Renunciation of Holy Orders. I pronounced and recorded this action in the presence of two priests of this Diocese on December 27, 2006. As of that date, David Miller is no longer a Priest-in-Good-Standing in this Diocese and is no longer the Rector of St. Johns Episcopal Church in Petaluma.
Also on December 27, 2006, I wrote to the Wardens and Vestry of St. Johns Episcopal Church that they appear to be in violation of Canon I.17.8, given their action to dissociate themselves and the Parish from the Episcopal Church and the Diocese of Northern California. I therefore have declared the Offices of Wardens and the Vestry vacant.
A priest-in-charge, Wardens and Vestry may be appointed at a later date.
St. Johns Episcopal Church has been part of the Episcopal Church since its founding, first as a Parish in the Diocese of California and then as a Parish of the Diocese of Northern California when this diocese was formed. The Diocese of Northern California will resist any and all efforts to remove a parish from the jurisdiction of this diocese and the Bishop of Northern California.
The Rt. Rev. Jerry A. Lamb
Bishop of Northern California
Sigh. The Church is more than buildings and property.
Sounds like the local folks were trying to play nice. That can be foolish when dealing with supporters of heresy.
Lamb can play the snake all he wants, but there is court precedence in California that the property is the congregation's, NOT the denomination's. His tough language is very likely merely an attempt at intimidation--for if they don't back down, he likely will have to.
Typical Jerry.
This has no real weight as he is a real lame duck bishop, and the recent court rulings in California have been in favor of the parish leaving a diocese.
It depends if the congregation did its homework. There isn't enough here to tell. If they did, they probably shouldn't have asked for release, but should have just informed him that they had changed the sign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.