Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

You wrote:

“You mean this is what you say.”

No. That is what we know. Refute any of it if you can. Of course you can’t. Still you wasted our time with this:

“Did Paul and Peter and the other apostles have that code book?”

Did John when he used 666? No.

“And all those people in Mesopotamia, and Asia Minor, and even in Rome?”

No. Clearly none was needed. Only you and other Protestants deny what is known. You need a code book. We already have the knowledge.

“How come they didn't know about this code word?”

They did. Prove otherwise. Again, there are references to Rome as Babylon in apocrypha as well. They knew. You don’t.

“They weren't living in the magisterium's fantasyland back then.”

You’re the one in a fantasy land. Can you refute what I pointed out or not? You aren’t even trying.

“And now you are reduced to citing mystics and gnostics as authoritative.”

Nope. If you want to call mainstream Protestant scholars of the last 500 years “Gnostics” go ahead.

“That is merely further evidence of their confusion and the confusion of those who cite them as authoritative.”

You’re confused. I’m not.

“you mean, until they got Bibles in their hands and read them and saw that the Papal Magisterium had been lying to them for 1200 years.”

Nope. Most of the earliest Protestants actually believed “Babylon” in 1 Peter was a code word for Rome. Also, they always had Bibles.

“I just did and I will continue to do so below.”

No, actually you didn’t refute anything. All you did was dispute it. That is not refutation. You really don’t know how logical argumentation works do you? Do you need us to help you with that too? That’s okay, we’re used to schooling Protestants anyway.

“How about The Universal Standard Encyclopedia: Babylon: " . . . Even after the founding of of Baghdad, Babylon remained the capitol of the district. Later it became simply a village . . . ". “

That in no way refutes anything I posted since I never once questioned the actual existence of the city. LOL!!! Is that the best you can do? You refute something that isn’t even asserted by me? Hilarious. You just can’t do this.

“So Babylon in Peter's day was a village, a caravan stop as others have characterized it here. What a great place to start a church --- in a village that was a caravan stop carrying goods east and west and where all the people in the surrounding area of Babylonia [Mesopotamia]would come to trade and share the news carried by the caravaners. And furthermore, a great place to mail a letter that is to be delivered to the sojourners in Asia Minor along the way of those caravans headed to and from Rome. So are you going to tell us that "Babylon" was not a real place in Peter's day?”

I never once said it wasn’t a real place. Why do you lie about what I said? Listen, I don’t mind you embarrassing yourself by trying to refute obviously known history, but there’s absolutely no reason to lie about what I said. I never once said there was no Babylon. I never once said that Babylon no longer existed, had no population in it, etc. Don’t lie about what I said. Do you think you can muster up the integrity to actually deal with what I said rather than making things up out of thin air?


360 posted on 12/18/2006 7:54:03 AM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
Only you and other Protestants deny what is known. You need a code book. We already have the knowledge.

Oh, so you do have a secret code book. Did Peter have the same one? Did you get the secret decoder ring with it? or didn't you save up enough boxtops?

I never once said it wasn’t a real place. Why do you lie about what I said? Listen, I don’t mind you embarrassing yourself by trying to refute obviously known history, but there’s absolutely no reason to lie about what I said. I never once said there was no Babylon. I never once said that Babylon no longer existed, had no population in it, etc. Don’t lie about what I said. Do you think you can muster up the integrity to actually deal with what I said rather than making things up out of thin air?

Good --- I accept your admission of the truth that Babylon was a real place in Peter's day. So what is left to refute. Your code book is inaccurate. You should trade it in for a good encyclopedia.

Let us part company then by meditating on those famous words of the Apostle Peter from that Jewish church at that real place in Babylonia:

"The Church that is at Babylon ... greeteth you". [I Peter 5:13]

What more needs to be said. Amen.

361 posted on 12/18/2006 10:11:11 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson