Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion
They have no tradition of Peter having been there at all.

Do they have Peter's first epistle in their Bibles.? Do they have verse 5:13 of that epistle in their Bibles? If they do, then they have that "tradition", but must have just forgotten about it when the Roman magisterium came to town.

355 posted on 12/18/2006 4:09:45 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

This is what we know:

1) Christian scholars overwhelmingly believe the reference to Babylon was a codeword for Rome.

2) Early Christians, according to ALL of the evidence, believe that Babylon was a code word for Rome.

3) Early Christian writings (those of the Fathers and those of apocryphal writers) use Babylon as a code word for Rome or say that Babylon is a code word for Rome.

4) No one apparently denied the obvious until they, the Protestant Revolutionaries, wanted to separate themselves from the pope.

5) You can't refute any of the above.

6) You have presented exactly no evidence against the above.


356 posted on 12/18/2006 5:44:08 AM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson