Nonsense and that is not what was written. This is:
The act of creation itself would often involve a sort of cobbling together of bits of the past gathered here and there, a bundling of whatever information and knowledge might be available, and a fitting of this newly made historical bricolage into a framework that the writers of the original sources might not have recognized.
Thus the charge that the Latin Church is really more accurately called the Frankish-Latin Church.
You wrote: "Nonsense and that is not what was written. This is:"
Zemo, I quoted from THE VERY PAGE THAT WAS LINKED TO BY YOU. Get a clue. I cut and pasted from that very page you linked to. If you can't tell when the passage that you yourself linked to is being used then you might want to rethink using it as a source!!!
"Thus the charge that the Latin Church is really more accurately called the Frankish-Latin Church."
Is still bogus. You have yet to prove a single example of the Franks affecting any church other than their own. I don't expect evidence from you. You have already been shown to be lacking in the right department. You don't even know your own sources well!