Seems to me that Gibson is as much of a heretic as the other roque "Catholic" churches that have women and married priests.
There's a Malibu Gibson named Mel
Who, though richer than God, lately fell
From Hollywood grace
("Much too Jewish a place!")
And his head up his ass doth now dwell.
If the Catholic Church is and was unchanging for 2000 years, why is it a biggie that Mel just follows an older version. Doesn't the 16th Century church teach the same unchanging doctrines and can lead to salvation just as well as the new-fangled one? Or does Mel's church teach something beyond what the 16th Century RCC held to?
What does not being recognized by an Archdiocese indicate?
Asked out of ignorance...
Good for him! God bless Mr. Gibbson and his family and keep them safe. PS Apocalypto was awesome........
I'm afraid if I lived in Mahoney's LA diocese, I'd be going SSPX too.
Quote from the article: "...to the 1965 Vatican II Conference..."
Vatican II was a "Conference"? Gee, I always thought it was an ecumenical council!