Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open to Life: Asking Protestants to Ponder Mary
CatholicExchange.com ^ | 12-07-06 | Pete Vere

Posted on 12/08/2006 4:44:04 PM PST by Salvation

Pete Vere, JCL  
Other Articles by Pete Vere, JCL
Printer Friendly Version
 
Open to Life: Asking Protestants to Ponder Mary

December 7, 2006

Like many pro-life writers, I spend my fair share of time interacting with the evangelical Protestant community. I find them zealous when it comes to combating abortion. In fact, their zeal is what usually tips me off about Christmas's approach. The first candle is barely lit on the Advent wreath when our evangelical brethren begin publishing a barrage of articles, reflections and sermons on the theme, "What if Mary had aborted Jesus?"

The question, of course, is rhetorical. One could not imagine Mother Mary aborting Baby Jesus. Such an action would have changed the course of salvation history for the worse, in that salvation would have become impossible without Christ to bridge the gap between God and man.

Thus our evangelical brethren mean no disrespect toward the Blessed Mother. They are simply pointing out the obvious: Mary was in a position not unlike that of many young single mothers, yet in choosing life, her actions greatly benefited mankind. Hence one should acknowledge that there is always the opportunity for an opening to God's grace whenever a woman finds herself with child.

Although the above argument originates from evangelical Protestants, I can accept it as a Catholic. Yet the majority of Evangelicals who I know - including those within the pro-life movement - promote contraception as permissible to Christians. Dr. Tim LaHaye, for example, is a founder of the US Moral Majority and the co-author of the popular evangelical apocalyptic Left Behind series. He is also a well-known example of an Evangelical who promotes contraception among married couples while claiming to be a pro-life Christian.

Nevertheless, whenever I encounter Evangelicals within the pro-life movement, I try to correct their erroneous view of contraception. These are often the same Evangelicals whom I watch debate abortion with mainline Protestants. I have seen them pop the "Would Mary have aborted Jesus?" argument during these intra-Protestant debates. With Christmas approaching, I knew they would be sharing reflections on our pro-life internet forum that ask the same question.

This got me thinking as we debated the morality of contraception: "What would have happened if Mary had contracepted Jesus?" The answer was obvious: the same as what evangelical Protestants propose would have happened if Mary had aborted Jesus. There would have been no Christmas morning. And without Christmas there would have been no Easter, no crucifixion and resurrection, and no salvation history. [Editor's note: The point here is not to contend that a "barrier method" would have prevented Mary conceiving Christ, but that fundamentally, contraception says "no" to God.]

 In light of the similar outcome, I thought the Evangelicals with whom I debate would see the folly of their pro-contraception position. With one exception, however, my question was met first with stunned silence and then with outrage from our evangelical brethren. How dare I suggest that contraception was forbidden to Christians. "Where does the Bible condemn contraception?"

I found this last question strange, given that during a simultaneous debate with their mainline Protestant counterparts, the same evangelicals were asking: "Where does the Bible promote abortion?" Of course this was after the mainliners had pointed out that nowhere in the King James translation does one find the word "abortion".

As an aside, this taught me a valuable lesson about Protestants. When they oppose a practice as ungodly, they ask "Where does the Bible teach this practice?" When they favor a similar practice, the question changes to, "Where does the Bible condemn this practice?" Thus the Evangelical can say, "the Bible does not condemn contraception" while the Anglican states, "the Bible makes no mention of abortion."

Some Things Really Are Abominable

To be fair to Evangelicals and to mainline Protestants, they are both wrong. Holy Scripture clearly and explicitly condemns these abominable practices against the culture of life. While you never read the words "contraception" and "abortion" in the Bible, the early Church fathers understood these practices to be sorcery and witchcraft, which are mentioned.

The noted Jesuit catechist Fr. John A. Hardon, in his essay "Contraception: Fatal to the Faith and to Eternal Life," wrote:

In the Roman Empire of the first century of the Christian era, contraception was universally approved and practiced by the people.... In the language of the day, contraceptive practice was referred to as "using magic" and "using drugs." It was in this sense that the first century Teaching of the Twelve Apostles [Didiche] warns Christians in four successive precepts: "You shall not use magic." "You shall not use drugs." "You shall not procure abortion." "You shall not destroy an unborn child."

"The sequence of those prohibitions is significant," Father Hardon continues. "We know from the record of those times that women would first try some magical rites or use sorcery to avoid conception. If this failed, they would take one or another of then known seventeen medically approved contraceptives. If a woman still became pregnant, she would try to abort. And if even this failed, she and her male partner could always resort to infanticide, which was approved by Roman law."

"Christians were warned not to follow the example of their pagan contemporaries, who walked in darkness and the shadow of death," Father Hardon concludes. "Christians were absolutely forbidden to practice contraception, which leads to abortion, which leads to infanticide."

Not surprising, as Catholics prepare to celebrate the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Church of England, to quote one Anglican news source, "has joined one of Britain's royal medical colleges in calling for legal euthanasia of seriously disabled newborn babies...." This is the same Anglican Church that first accepted contraception as permissible to Christians. The rest of Protestantism soon followed. The Anglican Church then accepted abortion under certain extreme circumstances, and for the most part Protestantism has followed.

So where would we be if Mary had practiced contraception? As we prepare for Advent and the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ - as we prepare to celebrate the Gift that came through Mary's openness to life - I ask my evangelical Protestant brethren to ponder this question.



TOPICS: Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: abortion; anglican; blessedvirginmary; catholic; catholiclist; christmas; contraception; cultureoflife; evangelical; prolife; protestant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: Campion

Fair enough. I didn't read all of it earlier. I only read the first 1/4th or so until now.

Nevertheless, I think my analogy is quite sufficiently fitting even if responding only to the title.

Pondering Mary is not on my agenda. Pondering all that Christ is and said and wants of me IS.


21 posted on 12/08/2006 8:10:25 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Pondering Mary is not on my agenda. Pondering all that Christ is and said and wants of me IS

So you're saying that Luke 1:46-56 isn't God-breathed, and isn't useful for instruction in righteousness, contra 2 Tm 3:16-17?

And why pick on Mary? You ought to get rid of Hebrews 11:1-12:1, too, since those verses are holding people other than Jesus up for admiration.

The Bible doesn't teach "Jesus and me" Christianity. It never has.

22 posted on 12/08/2006 8:16:16 PM PST by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

Strangely enough, even the former Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, Robert Runcie, has noted that.


23 posted on 12/08/2006 8:17:26 PM PST by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Campion

I clearly interpret such Scriptures differently than Romanists do.


24 posted on 12/08/2006 8:36:21 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Actually, all Christians believed contraception was immoral until 1930.

I understand. Protestantism is creative Biblical Interpretation 101. That's why I left.


25 posted on 12/08/2006 8:54:59 PM PST by Joseph DeMaistre (There's no such thing as relativism, only dogmatism of a different color)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Thank you for the very engaging metaphor!


26 posted on 12/08/2006 9:16:47 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

de nada;

bu xie;

LUB


27 posted on 12/08/2006 9:24:27 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Seems like you already have, so I will ask you a couple of questions. If he was killed by God for not wasting his seed, then if he had just said not interested, or no, he would have displeased God and died. I remember Ruth had a kinsman redeemer who was closer in relation to her husband than Boaz, and gave some inheritance loss as an excuse, and he was not killed by God. So, how come? God was angry, lost His temper, and now there aren't any kids unless she can go to another relative. And, it seems this brother said yes, then changed his mind, and, from what we know today, she could have still conceived even after he died, as that isn't a very safe form on contraception. Hmmm. Contra-ception.


28 posted on 12/08/2006 9:29:56 PM PST by huldah1776 (Worthy is the Lamb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

This thread is about pro-life. Your comments surprise me.

Prayers for all the pro-lifers. (Including you, I think.)


29 posted on 12/08/2006 9:37:55 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

**She freely accepted the greatest honor bestowed on mankind.**

Yes, if we could all pattern our lives after Mary and day, "Yes" to God.


30 posted on 12/08/2006 9:39:46 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marsh_of_mists

Thanks.


31 posted on 12/08/2006 9:40:37 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

**Who are we to say no to God, when He gives us a blessing? We MUST reconsider our policy on contraception, and stop picking and choosing what we will and will not accept as truth.**

Amen!


32 posted on 12/08/2006 9:42:02 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ottofire

**I would reason that she was chosen from the beginning**

Absolutely. That's what the Immaculate Conception is all about.


33 posted on 12/08/2006 9:44:28 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Agree with everything you said here. Mary, the Mother of the Church, pray for us!


34 posted on 12/08/2006 9:46:49 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; sandyeggo; Lady In Blue; NYer; american colleen; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ...
Catholic Discussion Ping!

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Catholic Discussion Ping List.

35 posted on 12/08/2006 9:52:01 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thanks.

I think.

LOL.


36 posted on 12/08/2006 9:53:27 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Mary did practice contraception.

Abstinence. It works every time its tried.
37 posted on 12/08/2006 10:02:51 PM PST by JRochelle (Duncan Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Um. No. Mary is just a very godly and blessed woman. She does not show up in water stains or toast giving prophecy, and does not give blessings or intercede for us. She is now resting in heaven.


38 posted on 12/08/2006 10:08:07 PM PST by Ottofire (O great God of highest heaven, Glorify Your Name through me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Natural Family Planning (not contraception)


39 posted on 12/08/2006 10:13:54 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ottofire
Then why did Luther, Calvin and Zwingli, among other reformers think differently?

Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary

40 posted on 12/08/2006 10:17:33 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson