Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50; Alamo-Girl
[ But the bottom line is that those who knew Christ in Person when He walked the earth (that would not be either +Paul or +Luke), and who listened to His ministry, quote the Lord in the Gospels almost exclusively, if not exclusively, from LXX, which is the Old Testament you say 'erased' the name of God. How strange! I say again, this takes the cake! ]

And the Holy Spirit?.. Is the Holy Spirit interpreting scripture today or at any time?..

And if so whom does he interpret it to?..
And if not, why not?...

Is the Holy Spirit functioning in THIS CONVERSATION?...

7,331 posted on 01/23/2007 9:09:57 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7323 | View Replies ]


To: hosepipe; Alamo-Girl
And the Holy Spirit?..

The Holy Spirit was sent to the Apostles according to the Gospels, and witnessed by others, to guide them, not to teach them. The Apostles were 'inspired.' We are not. They chose LXX as the course of the OT, and they quote our Lord jesus Chirst as using LXX in His references to the OT. That should be good enough for all Christians.

The important thing to remember is that the Holy Spirit did not teach them. Christ did.

This is the crucial difference. +Paul claims that God revealed Christ in him, not "to" him. He was not only converted to Christ instantly, but given all the knowledge to interpret the Christ he never knew. That is Gnosticism dear friend. Not even +John the Forerunner (Baptist) was that audacious!

7,338 posted on 01/23/2007 10:06:31 AM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson