Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50; P-Marlowe; Buggman; blue-duncan; scripter; Dr. Eckleburg

Nope. A few things.

1. Conceived is the appropriate translation. Matthew, in particular, is relating to the Isaiah 7:14 prophecy that says a virgin will conceive. If conceive is not permitted to mean "become pregnant" in that verse, then virgin is not permitted to mean "sexually inexperienced female." In that case, we have no virgin and no pregnancy.

2. Since it is the Holy Spirit who is the active agent in the pregnancy of Mary, there is never the hint of sexual relations. "Come upon" and "overshadow" are clear indications that something special is taking place in this instance. In other biblical cases, one reads about "lying with" and "knowing."

Therefore, Mary clearly became pregnant. That had an inception point caused by the Holy Spirit, and that was the "becoming" (conceiving, gennao) that took place.

How did the Holy Spirit cause the conceiving? Through His divine power. Yet the child developed through the stages of pregnancy from implanted fetus through birth.


554 posted on 12/07/2006 6:24:02 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; kosta50; P-Marlowe; Buggman; scripter; Dr. Eckleburg

Conceive, the word used for Mary in Luke 1:31 is the same word used for Mary's cousin Elizabeth in Luke 1:24, 36 and of Rebecca in Rom. 9:10.


557 posted on 12/07/2006 6:34:39 AM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson