[jo kus]

I wish that were the case. If you can convince Rome to renounce the anathemas of the Council of Trent, renounce it’s position on Justification, renounce it’s dogmas of Penance, Assumption of Mary, Immaculate Conception, papal infallibility, purgatory and renounce it’s position on petrine primacy, then there will be a basis for discussion based on truth.

= = = Goodness. Miracles never cease. I AGREE that it would be wonderful, if such were renounced by Rome.

You are merely proving my theory, that Protestants believe they are infallible. You don't just disagree with Rome, you KNOW you are right and they are wrong.

Amazing that God would bless so many people who cannot agree with each other with the gift of individual infallibility!

Perhaps the more proper term would be "logically impossible". Think about it.

[Quix]

No.

I don’t believe I’m infallible.

Just not as fallible as the traditions of men edifice of the RC . . . structure etc. . . .

but it’s just an old version of many such structures of men . . . and thereby MORE vulnerable to traditions of men errors.

Vocabulary time . . .

MORE than is DIFFERENT from LESS than.

MORE is different from 0.00.

“A” as MORE fallible than “B” does not mean that “B” is 100% INFALLIBLE.